There is the old minster or parish church, then the landowner’s church,
with burial-place, erected on his private estate for the convenience of
his family, tenants, and labourers. This becomes a new parish church
within the district of the old minster. Edgar’s laws are the first to
mention these churches. But since A.D. 675 chapels of ease had been
built, but no district, no parish boundary, was assigned to any of
them. The slow and gradual manner in which parochial churches became
independent, appears of itself an efficient answer to those who ascribe a
great antiquity to the universal payment of tithes.[158]
It is impossible to state precisely when parishes in England were formed.
There is no record or evidence to show it. They gradually commenced in
the latter quarter of the seventh century and increased very much in the
eighth century. It is too late to assign the origin of our modern parish
churches to the reign of King Edgar. It would be nearer the truth to say
that the modern parish churches gradually grew up from Bede’s account
in A.D. 686, but were not then called parishes. It is evident that the
two churches recorded by Bede were built for the accommodation of those
residing on each of the earls’ estates. So when churches increased,
the jurisdiction of the incumbent of each manorial church was limited
by the extent of the landowner’s estate. Hence the estate on which the
church was built, with burial ground, became the parochial boundary.
Some estates were larger than others; hence the parochial areas are very
unequal.
The church had a boundary conterminous with the landowner’s estate. And
by Edgar’s law the incumbent received one-third of the tithes of the
estate on which the church was built, free from all incidental expenses.
The old minster received the remaining two-thirds for the purpose of
repairing the churches and relieving the poor and strangers.[159] Edgar’s
law points out a division of the tithes. But the most important question
in reference to Edgar’s appropriation is “Why was one-third specially
assigned to the priest of the manorial church?” Because that part was the
well-recognised priest’s share of the tithes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account