A journal, of a young man of Massachusetts, late a surgeon on board an American privateer, who was captured at sea by the British in May, eighteen hundred and thirteen and was confined first, at Melville Island, Halifax, then at Chatham, in England, and last at Dartmoor prison : $b Interspersed with observations, anecdotes and remarks, tending to illustrate the moral and political characters of three nations. To which is added, a correct engraving of Dartmoor prison, representing the massacre ofWaterhouse, Benjamin
History
A journal, of a young man of Massachusetts, late a surgeon on board an American privateer, who was captured at sea by the British in May, eighteen hundred and thirteen and was confined first, at Melville Island, Halifax, then at Chatham, in England, and last at Dartmoor prison : $b Interspersed with observations, anecdotes and remarks, tending to illustrate the moral and political characters of three nations. To which is added, a correct engraving of Dartmoor prison, representing the massacre of
Waterhouse, Benjamin
Dartmoor Prison; United States -- History -- War of 1812 -- Prisoners and prisons
At the same time that the firing was going on in the square, a
cross fire was also kept up from several of the platforms on the
walls round the prisoners where the sentries stand, by straggling
parties of soldiers who ran up there for that purpose. As far as
this fire was directed to disperse the men assembled round the
breach, for which purpose it was most effectual, it seems to stand
upon the same ground as that in the first instance in the
square.--That part which it is positively sworn was directed
against straggling parties of prisoners running about the yards
and endeavoring to enter in the few doors which the turnkeys,
according to their usual practice, had left open, does seem, as
stated, to have been wholly without object or excuse, and to have
been a wanton attack upon the lives of defenceless, and at that
time, unoffending individuals.
In the same, or even more severe terms, we must remark upon what
was proved as to the firing in the door-ways of the prisons, more
particularly into that of No. 3 prison, at a time when the men
were in crowds at the entrance. From the position of the prison
and the door, and from the marks of the balls which were pointed
out to us, as well as from the evidence, it was clear this firing
must have proceeded from soldiers a very few feet from the door
way; and although it was certainly sworn that the prisoners were
at the time of part of the firing at least, continuing to insult
and occasionally to throw stones at the soldiers, and that they
were standing in the way of, and impeding the turnkey, who was
there for the purpose of closing the door, yet still there was
nothing stated which could, in our view, at all justify such
excessively harsh and severe treatment of helpless and unarmed
prisoners, when all idea of escape was at an end.
Under these impressions, we used every endeavor to ascertain if
there was the least prospect of identifying any of the soldiers
who had been guilty of the particular outrages here alluded to, or
of tracing any particular death, at that time to the firing of any
particular individual, but without success; and all hopes of
bringing the offenders to punishment would seem to be at an end.
In conclusion, we, the undersigned, have only to add, that whilst
we lament, as we do most deeply, the unfortunate transaction which
has been the subject of this inquiry, we find ourselves unable to
suggest any steps to be taken as to those parts of it which seem
to call for redress and punishment.
(Signed)
CHARLES KING,
FRANCIS SEYMOUR LARPENT.
_Plymouth, April 26, 1815._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account