A journal, of a young man of Massachusetts, late a surgeon on board an American privateer, who was captured at sea by the British in May, eighteen hundred and thirteen and was confined first, at Melville Island, Halifax, then at Chatham, in England, and last at Dartmoor prison : $b Interspersed with observations, anecdotes and remarks, tending to illustrate the moral and political characters of three nations. To which is added, a correct engraving of Dartmoor prison, representing the massacre ofWaterhouse, Benjamin
History
A journal, of a young man of Massachusetts, late a surgeon on board an American privateer, who was captured at sea by the British in May, eighteen hundred and thirteen and was confined first, at Melville Island, Halifax, then at Chatham, in England, and last at Dartmoor prison : $b Interspersed with observations, anecdotes and remarks, tending to illustrate the moral and political characters of three nations. To which is added, a correct engraving of Dartmoor prison, representing the massacre of
Waterhouse, Benjamin
Dartmoor Prison; United States -- History -- War of 1812 -- Prisoners and prisons
After attending in the turnkey's lodge during the sitting of the
commissioners, until the middle of the third day, without having
but very few of the evidences sent for, and being fearful that
they might be waiting for them, the committee sent them word that
the witnesses were still in attendance. No answer being returned
to this message for some time, the committee became uneasy on
account of the long examination of the officers, soldiers, clerks,
and turnkeys, attached to the depot, without admitting the
prisoners to an equal privilege; and understanding the
commissioners were about closing their inquiry, they again sent
word they would be glad to have an interview for a few moments,
for the purpose of explaining the nature of their evidence, and
the necessity of a full hearing on both sides of the question. NO
ANSWER BEING RETURNED TO THIS REQUEST, and still waiting with the
anxious hope that they would soon send for some of us, when we
were told by one of the turnkeys, that the commissioners were
prepared to depart, having finished the examination. Astonished to
think they meant to leave the depot without clearly investigating
the circumstances that were the cause of their meeting, and
feeling indignant that a cause of so much importance should be
passed over so partially, the committee addressed a note to Mr.
King, begging him not to shut the door of communication against
the prisoners, by closing the inquiry without giving them the
privilege of a hearing, as the greatest part of our witnesses were
yet unexamined, and their evidence they conceived to be of the
utmost importance to the investigation. _No reply was made to this
note_; but, in a few moments, we were told, that the commissioners
had left the depot. How far they are justifiable in saying they
examined ALL the evidences that offered themselves, we think is
sufficiently shewn.
The commissioners next go on to mention the insurrection of the
prisoners about the bread, on the 4th, two days previous to the
events, the subject of that inquiry. Although the report correctly
states, the prisoners quietly returned to their own yards, after
their demands having been complied with, Mr. King forgot to
mention, that it was clearly represented to him, had the
prisoners been so disposed, on that night, they could have easily
made their escape. Although that transaction had nothing to do, as
relates to the prisoners, with the events of the 6th, we merely
represent this circumstance to show, that there was no intention
whatever on their part to break out of the prison, as Shortland
and his adherents have attempted to prove.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account