graduates, not in fame, but in infamy. Nothing could well be worse,
except the infamy of him who must have passed many a night in penning
that unutterably horrible and scandalous chronicle. The chronicler, on
the other hand, is not to be blamed for noting the little affectations of
those whom he encountered, as in the following example, the date of which
is 1781: “I met,” he says to Lady Ossory, “Mrs. Montagu the other night
at a visit. She told me she had been alone the whole preceding day, quite
hermetically sealed. I was very glad she was uncorked, or I might have
missed that piece of learned nonsense.” However, “Mrs. Montagu,” writes
Mrs. Boscawen to Mrs. Delany, “is in perfect health and spirits in her
Château Portman.” But, in Montagu House, Portman Square, the so-called
Bluestockings were much less at home than in Hill Street. Nevertheless,
there, and at similar houses supposed to be of a Bluestocking class,
Walpole was much more amused than when he was at the Princess Amelia’s,
at Gunnersbury, with the “cream of the cream” of Europe, and playing
commerce with the grandest of them. He never had to say of himself at
Mrs. Montagu’s, as he did of his doings at the Princess’s, “Played three
pools of commerce till ten. I am afraid I was tired, and gaped!”
There died in this year, 1781, a Provincial Bluestocking,—who has been
delicately praised by Miss Seward, and furiously attacked and ridiculed
by Horace Walpole,—Mrs. Miller, the neighbour of Mrs. Scott and Lady Bab
Montagu at Batheaston. There is an old story that Walpole, declining
to recognise a man in London whom he had known at Bath, explained
himself by saying, that he would be happy to know the same individual
again—at Bath! So, with regard to literary or _bas-bleu_ assemblies, he
acknowledged those only of London. Provincial meetings he treated as
shams, and covered them with ridicule. Mrs. Miller’s house,—to which she
invited a rather mixed assembly of persons distinguished for intellectual
merit, or persons who were distinguished only by the accident of
birth,—Walpole mis-named the “puppet-show Parnassus at Batheaston” (or
Pindus)—“a new Parnassus, composed of three laurels, a myrtle-tree, a
weeping willow, and a view of the Avon, which has been new-christened
Helicon.” Miss Rich, Lady Lyttelton’s sister, took Walpole to dine
there.... He ridiculed his hosts, described Captain Miller as officious,
though good-natured, who, with his wife, had caught “taste,” and outlived
their income. Having (like wise and honest people) recovered themselves
by living economically abroad, they resumed their old home with improved
habits. “Alas!” says Walpole, “Mrs. Miller is returned a beauty, a
genius, a Sappho, a tenth Muse, as romantic as Mademoiselle de Scuderi,
and as sophisticated as Mrs. Vesey. They have introduced _bouts-rimés_
as a new discovery. They hold a Parnassus fair every Thursday, give out
rhymes and themes, and all the flux and quality of Bath contend for the
prizes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account