A Literary History of Ireland, from Earliest Times to the Present DayHyde, Douglas
History
A Literary History of Ireland, from Earliest Times to the Present Day
Hyde, Douglas
Civilization, Celtic, in literature; Irish literature -- History and criticism; Language and culture -- Ireland
"The Church," writes Windisch, "adopted towards pagan sagas, the same
position that it adopted towards pagan law.... I see no sufficient
ground for doubting that really genuine pictures of a pre-Christian
culture are preserved to us in the individual sagas, pictures which
are of course in some places faded, and in others painted over by a
later hand."[1]
Again in his notes on the story of Déirdre, he remarks--
"The saga originated in pagan, and was propagated in Christian
times, and that too without its seeking fresh nutriment as a rule
from Christian elements. But we must ascribe it to the influence of
Christianity that what is specifically pagan in Irish saga is blurred
over and forced into the background. And yet there exist many whose
contents are plainly mythological. The Christian monks were certainly
_not the first_ who reduced the ancient sagas to fixed form, but later
on they copied them faithfully, and propagated them after Ireland had
been converted to Christianity."
Zimmer too has come to the same conclusion.
"Nothing," he writes, "except a spurious criticism which takes
for original and primitive the most palpable nonsense of which
Middle-Irish writers from the twelfth to the sixteenth century are
guilty with regard to their own antiquity, which is in many respects
strange and foreign to them: nothing but such a criticism can, on the
other hand, make the attempt to doubt of the historical character
of the chief persons of the Saga cycles.[2] For we believe that
Mève, Conor mac Nessa, Cuchulain, and Finn mac Cúmhail, are exactly
as much historical personalities as Arminius, or Dietrich of Bern,
or Etzel, and their date is just as well determined as that of the
above-mentioned heroes and kings, who are glorified in song by the
Germans, even though, in the case of Irish heroes and kings, external
witnesses are wanting.'"
M. d'Arbois de Jubainville expresses himself in like terms. "We have no
reason," he writes, "to doubt of the reality of the principal _rôle_
in this [cycle of Cuchulain];"[3] and of the story of the Boru tribute
which was imposed on Leinster about a century later; he writes, "Le
récit a pour base des faits réels, quoique certains détails aient été
créés par l'imagination;" and again, "Irish epic story, barbarous
though it is, is, like Irish law, a monument of a civilisation far
superior to that of the most ancient Germans; if the Roman idea of the
state was wanting to that civilisation, and, if that defect in it was
a radical flaw, still there is an intellectual culture to be found
there, far more developed than amongst the primitive Germans.'"[4]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account