A Literary History of the ArabsNicholson, Reynold Alleyne
History
A Literary History of the Arabs
Nicholson, Reynold Alleyne
Arabic literature -- History and criticism
"In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Praise be to
God by the praise of whom every written or spoken discourse is
opened! And blessings on Muḥammad, the Elect, the Prophet and
Apostle, as well as on his family and his companions who lead us
forth from error! To proceed: You have asked me, O my brother in
religion, to explain to you the hidden meanings and the ultimate
goal of the sciences, and the secret bane of the different
doctrines, and their inmost depths. You wish me to relate all that I
have endured in seeking to recover the truth from amidst the
confusion of sects with diverse ways and paths, and how I have dared
to raise myself from the abyss of blind belief in authority to the
height of discernment. You desire to know what benefits I have
derived in the first place from Scholastic Theology, and what I have
appropriated, in the second place, from the methods of the
Ta‘límites[720] who think that truth can be attained only by
submission to the authority of an Imám; and thirdly, my reasons for
spurning the systems of philosophy; and, lastly, why I have accepted
the tenets of Ṣúfiism: you are anxious, in short, that I should
impart to you the essential truths which I have learned in my
repeated examination of the (religious) opinions of mankind."
In a very interesting passage, which has been translated by Professor
Browne, Ghazálí tells how from his youth upward he was possessed with an
intense thirst for knowledge, which impelled him to study every form of
religion and philosophy, and to question all whom he met concerning the
nature and meaning of their belief.[721] But when he tried to
distinguish the true from the false, he found no sure test. He could not
trust the evidence of his senses. The eye sees a shadow and declares it
to be without movement; or a star, and deems it no larger than a piece
of gold. If the senses thus deceive, may not the mind do likewise?
Perhaps our life is a dream full of phantom thoughts which we mistake
for realities--until the awakening comes, either in moments of ecstasy
or at death. "For two months," says Ghazálí, "I was actually, though not
avowedly, a sceptic." Then God gave him light, so that he regained his
mental balance and was able to think soundly. He resolved that this
faculty must guide him to the truth, since blind faith once lost never
returns. Accordingly, he set himself to examine the foundations of
belief in four classes of men who were devoted to the search for truth,
namely, Scholastic Theologians, Ismá‘ílís (_Bátiniyya_), Philosophers,
and Ṣúfís. For a long while he had to be content with wholly negative
results. Scholasticism was, he admitted, an excellent purge against
heresy, but it could not cure the disease from which he was suffering.
As for the philosophers, all of them--Materialists (_Dahriyyún_),
Naturalists (_Ṭabí‘iyyún_), and Theists (_Iláhiyyún_)--"are branded
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account