A Maid of Brittany: A RomanceKnowles, Mabel Winifred
History
A Maid of Brittany: A Romance
Knowles, Mabel Winifred
Brittany (France) -- History -- 1341-1532 -- Fiction
"She had heard," he said, "that our father was no more, and would, in
spite of her brother’s opposition, insist straightway on coming to
Mereac, deeming the time a fitting one to heal a sore breach betwixt
loving kinsmen, by an explanation which should have been made long
since."
"Loving kinsmen!" murmured Gwennola, plucking at the girdle round her
waist. "Bah! I would have little of such love, I trow."
"And so," continued Yvon, heeding her not, "she hath come to Mereac, and
told me her story."
"Which thou hast believed with all the simplicity of a yearling babe."
"Tush! child, thou pratest of what thou knowest not; little like was I
to be deceived. Yet verily there was no deception in the eyes of
mademoiselle; whilst, as for the story, it is simplicity itself."
"As was the hearer," whispered Gwennola. "And the story, brother?"
"Truly for the most part I knew it before. My sole enemy was François
Kerden, who himself stole upon me in the wood, and would have killed me,
for no reason but wanton cruelty, had not the fouler scheme entered his
head. Yet, even as it came to him, fate furthered the plot, for
Guillaume de Coray, seeing in part what was chancing, sprang to the
spot, and would have revenged my death, as he supposed, on my murderer,
had not the Frenchman intervened and robbed him of his prey and me."
Yvon stopped with a groan as the memory of those three years of
imprisonment returned to him.
"But," said Gwennola coldly, "the story scarce bears the light of truth,
brother, seeing that Henri d’Estrailles saw the traitor blow struck;
besides, if so innocent, why fled this so noble kinsman when he saw thee
appear? and why did he strive to doom to death another, when he saw who
had in reality struck thee down, according to this pretty fable?"
"Nay," said Yvon, knitting his brows, "it is easily explained, didst
thou but listen, girl. It was in this way. Guillaume had already been
wounded, and, faint with loss of blood, could scarce distinguish betwixt
Frenchman or Breton. Both wore closed vizors, and both were near at the
time of my fall; which had struck the blow Guillaume could scarce
realize. The Breton fled, however, and whilst he turned to strike him
down in the act, the Frenchman opened his vizor, and de Coray clearly
saw his features. Methinks it was this that confused him in claiming
that d’Estrailles had done the coward’s act, for but one face was
imprinted on his reeling memory, and surely ’twere easy thus to confuse
which of the twain he had seen actually to perform the foul deed. That
it was Kerden himself is shown by the part he afterwards played in so
torturing me."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account