A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of AntiquityHeeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
History
A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of Antiquity
Heeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
R. CHANDLER, _Ionian Antiquities_. London, 1796, 1797, 2 vols. fol.
A worthy companion to Stuart.
CHOISEUL GOUFFIER, _Voyage pittoresque dans la Grece_, vol. i,
1779: vol. ii, 1809. Confined principally to the islands and Asia
Minor.
1. From a multitude of small states, never united but continually
distracted by civil broils--and such at the beginning of this period
were the states of Greece--any thing important could hardly be expected
without the occurrence of some external event, which, by rallying the
divided forces round one point, and directing them toward one object,
should hinder them from mutually exhausting one another. It was the
hostile attempt of Persia that first laid the foundation of the future
splendour of Greece; certain states then grew so rapidly in power, that
upon their particular history hinges the general history of all the
rest.
Causes which led to the Persian war. Share taken by Athens in the
Ionian insurrection and firing of Sardes, B. C. 500. (see above,
p. 98.) Intrigues of Hippias, first with the satraps, and afterwards
at the Persian court itself.--First expedition, that of Mardonius,
thwarted by a storm, 493.
2. Not even the summons to acknowledge the Persian authority was
sufficient to rouse the national energy of the Greeks. All the islands,
and most of the states on the main land, submitted to the yoke; Sparta
and Athens alone boldly rejected it. The Athenians, unassisted, under
their leader Miltiades, acquainted from his youth with the Persians and
their mode of warfare, and with the superiority of the arms of his
countrymen, became the saviours of Greece.
Quarrel of Athens and Sparta with Aegina, which sides with the
Persians, 491; and consequent deposition of Demaratus, king of
Sparta, by his colleague Cleomenes.
Persian expedition of Datis and Artaphernes under the guidance of
Hippias: frustrated by the battle of Marathon, B. C. Sept. 29,
490, and the failure of an attempt upon Athens.
3. The immediate consequence of this victory was a naval expedition
against the islands, more particularly Paros, to which Miltiades, out of
a private grudge, persuaded the Athenians. It was undertaken for the
purpose of levying contributions; and seems to have given the Athenians
the first idea of their subsequent dominion of the sea. The Athenians
punished Miltiades for the failure of this expedition, although the
effect of their own folly; yet was this act of injustice a source of
happiness to Athens; as the fall of Miltiades made room for the men who
laid the solid foundation of her glory and greatness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account