A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of AntiquityHeeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
History
A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of Antiquity
Heeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The independence of Cappadocia having
meanwhile been proclaimed at Rome, the inhabitants of the country,
in order to preclude domestic broils, themselves elect a king,
appointing to that dignity Ariobarzanes I. who was installed by
Sylla, 92, and, backed by the Romans, kept his footing in the
Mithridatic wars. In 63 he made the crown over to his son,
Ariobarzanes II. who was slain by the army of Brutus and Cassius,
43, as was his brother, Ariobarzanes III. 34, by Mark Antony;
Antony then appointed Archelaus to be king, who enticed to Rome by
Tiberius, A. D. 17, was there assassinated; and Cappadocia then
became a Roman province.
5. _Armenia_ was a province of the Syrian empire until the defeat
of Antiochus the Great by Rome, 190. That defeat was followed by
the accession of Antiochus's lieutenants, Artaxias and Zariadras;
and now arose the two kingdoms of Armenia Major and Armenia Minor
(the latter on the west bank of the Upper Euphrates). In Armenia
Major the family of Artaxias kept possession of the throne, under
eight (according to others _ten_) consecutive kings, until B. C.
5.--The only remarkable prince of this line was Tigranes I. 95-60,
son-in-law and ally of Mithridates the Great, and lord of Asia
Minor, Cappadocia, and Syria. He was, however, at the peace of 63,
obliged to give up all, so that Armenia was dependent on the
Romans, and remained so until B. C. 5, when it became the object
of contention between the Romans and Parthians, being ruled at
intervals by kings appointed by both parties, who endeavoured
thereby to protect their own provinces. Finally, in A. D. 412,
Armenia became a province of the new Persian empire.--In Asia
Minor the descendants of Zariadras ruled dependently on Rome;
after its defection under Mithridates the Great it usually formed
part of some one of the neighbouring kingdoms, until in the reign
of Vespasian it was converted into a province of the Roman empire.
VAILLANT, _Elenchus regum Armeniae Majoris_, in his _Hist. Imp.
Arsacidarum_.
4. Besides the above small kingdoms, two mighty empires arose in Inner
Asia, both out of Alexander's monarchy, and at the same time: these were
the Parthian and the Bactrian; each having previously constituted a part
of the empire of the Seleucidae, from which they seceded under Antiochus
II. The Parthian kingdom, or that of the Arsacidae, B. C. 256-A. D. 226,
at the maximum of its extension, comprised the countries between the
Euphrates and Indus. Its history, so far as we are acquainted with it,
is divided into four periods (see below); but unfortunately our
information is so imperfect respecting all that relates to the
Parthians, except their wars, that even the most important particulars
are beyond the reach of conjecture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account