A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of AntiquityHeeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
History
A Manual of Ancient History: Particularly with Regard to the Constitutions, the Commerce, and the Colonies, of the States of Antiquity
Heeren, A. H. L. (Arnold Hermann Ludwig)
Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The negotiations between Rome and Macedonia, from the year 214,
give the first striking examples of the ability and address of the
Romans in foreign policy; and they are the more remarkable, as the
treaty with the Aetolians and others, 211 (see above, p. 283), was
the remote cause of the transactions which afterwards took place
in the east. The peculiar system adopted by the Romans, of taking
the lesser states under their protection as allies, must always
have given them an opportunity of making war on the more powerful
whenever they chose. This in fact happened in the present case,
notwithstanding the peace concluded with Philip, 204. The chief
object of the Romans in this war, both by sea and land, was to
drive Philip completely out of Greece. The allies on both sides,
and the conditions of peace, were similar to those concluded with
Carthage (see above, p. 284). The destruction of the naval power
of her conquered enemies became now a maxim of Roman policy in
making peace; and she thus maintained the dominion of the seas
without any great fleet, and without losing the essential
character of a dominant power by land.
9. The expulsion of Philip from Greece brought that country into a state
of dependence upon Rome; an event which could not have been better
secured than by the present of liberty which T. Quintius conferred upon
its inhabitants at the Isthmian games. The system of surveillance, which
the Romans had already established in the west over Carthage and
Numidia, was now adopted in the east over Greece and Macedonia. Roman
commissioners, under the name of ambassadors, were sent into the country
of the nations in alliance, and were the principal means by which this
system of espionage was carried on. These however did not fail to give
umbrage to the Greeks, particularly to the turbulent Aetolians; more
especially as the Romans seemed in no hurry to withdraw their troops
from a country which they had declared to be free.
Liberty was expressly granted to the state which had taken the
part of Philip, namely, to the Achaeans; to the others it was
naturally understood to belong. It was nevertheless three years,
194, before the Roman army evacuated Greece and withdrew from the
fortified places. The conduct of T. Quintius during this period
fully shows what he was. The Greeks indeed had much want of such a
guardian if they wished to remain quiet: his conduct, however, in
the war against Nabis, 195, shows that he had not really at heart
the tranquillity of Greece.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account