A Manual of Elementary Geology: or, The Ancient Changes of the Earth and its Inhabitants as Illustrated by Geological MonumentsLyell, Charles, Sir
Science
A Manual of Elementary Geology: or, The Ancient Changes of the Earth and its Inhabitants as Illustrated by Geological Monuments
Lyell, Charles, Sir
Geology
Pebbles of quartzose sandstone, jasper, and flinty slate, together with
grains of chlorite and mica, speak plainly of the nature of the
pre-existing rocks, from the wearing down of which the greensand beds
were derived. The land, consisting of such rocks, was doubtless
submerged before the origin of the white chalk, as corals can only
multiply in the clear waters of the sea in spaces to which no mud or
sand are conveyed by currents.
HIPPURITE LIMESTONE.
_Difference between the chalk of the north and south of Europe._--By the
aid of the three tests of relative age, namely, superposition, mineral
character, and fossils, the geologist has been enabled to refer to the same
Cretaceous period certain rocks in the north and south of Europe, which
differ greatly, both in their fossil contents and in their mineral
composition and structure.
If we attempt to trace the cretaceous deposits from England and France to
the countries bordering the Mediterranean, we perceive, in the first place,
that the chalk and Greensand in the neighbourhood of London and Paris form
one great continuous mass, the Straits of Dover being a trifling
interruption, a mere valley with chalk cliffs on both sides. We then
observe that the main body of the chalk which surrounds Paris stretches
from Tours to near Poitiers (see the annexed map, fig. 223., in which the
shaded part represents chalk).
[Illustration: Fig. 223. Map of south-western France.]
Between Poitiers and La Rochelle, the space marked A on the map separates
two regions of chalk. This space is occupied by the Oolite and certain
other formations older than the Chalk, and has been supposed by M. E. de
Beaumont to have formed an island in the cretaceous sea. South of this
space we again meet with a formation which we at once recognize by its
mineral character to be chalk, although there are some places where the
rock becomes oolitic. The fossils are, upon the whole, very similar;
especially certain species of the genera _Spatangus_, _Ananchytes_,
_Cidarites_, _Nucula_, _Ostrea_, _Gryphaea_ (_Exogyra_), _Pecten_,
_Plagiostoma_ (_Lima_), _Trigonia_, _Catillus_, (_Inoceramus_), and
_Terebratula_.[221-A] But _Ammonites_, as M. d'Archiac observes, of which
so many species are met with in the chalk of the north of France, are
scarcely ever found in the southern region; while the genera _Hamite_,
_Turrilite_, and _Scaphite_, and perhaps _Belemnite_, are entirely wanting.
On the other hand, certain forms are common in the south which are rare or
wholly unknown in the north of France. Among these may be mentioned many
_Hippurites_, _Sphaerulites_, and other members of that great family of
mollusca called _Rudistes_ by Lamarck, to which nothing analogous has been
discovered in the living creation, but which is quite characteristic of
rocks of the Cretaceous era in the south of France, Spain, Sicily, Greece,
and other countries bordering the Mediterranean.
[Illustration: Fig. 224.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account