A manual on the origin and development of WashingtonCaemmerer, H. Paul (Hans Paul)
History
A manual on the origin and development of Washington
Caemmerer, H. Paul (Hans Paul)
Washington (D.C.) -- Description and travel; Washington (D.C.) -- History
Sometime about the early spring of 1910 some Senator had introduced
in the Senate a resolution providing for the purchase by the
Government of a number of paintings that nobody wanted to buy and
under the rule that resolution was referred to the Committee on the
Library. The responsibility for protecting the Government against a
waste of money was thus thrown upon the Committee.
A little discussion developed the fact that all the members of
the Committee had an uncomfortable feeling that the pictures were
probably worthless and no such purchase ought to be made but that no
member of the Committee felt any such confidence in his own knowledge
and judgment about such things as to feel like making a report to
the Senate based on his opinion, and maintaining that opinion on
the floor. We all felt that the Committee ought to have some way of
getting an expert opinion to guide it in making its report.
In the discussion we recalled Theodore Roosevelt’s appointment of
a Fine Arts Council, which fell to the ground because it had no
legal standing, and we recalled also the advantage received from the
report of park development of the informal commission selected by
the McMillan Committee, and we finally determined to ask Congress to
provide for the appointment of a fine arts commission which would
meet the need that our Committee was then experiencing and a similar
need which was liable to occur in a multitude of cases under which
Government officers had to pass on questions of art without being
really competent to perform such a duty. * * * I drafted a very brief
statute * * * and a little informal explanation of the need which the
Committee felt for expert assistance in the performing of its duties
carried the bill through.
And so, without creation of any power of legal compulsion, there
was brought to the service of the Government the authority of
competent opinion upon questions of art arising in the course of
administration, and widespread and habitual deference to such an
opinion has saved the Government and the community from God knows how
many atrocities.
From the time of its establishment, the Commission has been consulted
about every detail of the progress of the Plan of Washington, and also
about many works of art for which the Government makes appropriations.
This includes also works of art which our Government, as a result of
congressional enactment, presents to the governments and the peoples of
other countries to express our friendship and good will, or erects for
the use of our diplomatic corps abroad, or to perpetuate the memory of
our soldiers’ deeds of daring and courage. Good examples are the statue
of Leif Ericsson to Iceland, the statue of Henry Clay to Venezuela,
the American Embassy Building in Japan, and the World War Memorials in
Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account