France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction
In the early days of April the wind-swept, ice-tormented Pyrenees had
been exchanged for the Spanish lowlands, vexed by the drought and heat
of those spring days. If the army had suffered from frostbite and
pneumonia before, it groaned now under a plague of dysentery, but it was
still, and increasingly, victorious. An approving Convention sent
congratulatory messages to Dugommier, who enjoyed the
distinction—somewhat unusual for a general in those days—of having been
neither superseded nor recalled to suffer an insulting trial and an
ignoble death.
France had a short way with her public servants just then. Was an army
in retreat? To Paris with the traitor who commanded it. Was an
advantage insufficiently followed up? To the guillotine with the
officer responsible. Dumouriez saved his head by going to Austria with
young Égalité at his heels, but many and many a general who had led the
troops of France looked out of the little window, and was flung into the
common trench, to be dust in dust with nobles, great ladies, common
murderers, and the poor Queen herself. Closer and closer shaved the
national razor, heavier and heavier fell the pall upon blood-soaked
Paris. Marat, long since assassinated, and canonised as first Saint of
the New Calendar, with rites of an impiety quite indescribable, would,
had he lived, have seen his prophecy fulfilled. Paris had drunk and was
athirst again, and always with that drunkard’s craving which cannot be
allayed—no, not by all the floods of the infernal lake. Men were no
longer men, but victims of a horrible dementia. Listen to Hébert
demanding the Queen’s blood.
"Do you think that any of us will be able to save ourselves?" he cries.
"I tell you we are all damned already, but if my blood must flow, it
shall not flow alone. I tell you that if we pass, our passing shall
devastate France, and leave her ruined and bloody, a spectacle for the
nations!" And this at the beginning of the Terror!
A curious thought comes to one. Are these words, instinct with pure,
fate-driven tragedy, the fruit of Hébert’s mind—Hébert gross with Paris
slime, sensual, self-seeking, flushed with evil living? or is he, too,
unwillingly amongst the prophets, mouthpiece only of an immutable law,
which, outraged by him and his like, pronounces thus an irrevocable
doom?
Well might Danton write—"This is chaos, and the worlds are a-shaping.
One cannot see one’s way for the red vapour. I am sick of it—sick.
There is nothing but blood, blood, blood. Camille says that the
infernal gods are athirst. If they are not glutted soon there will be
no blood left to flow. They may have mine before long. Maximilian eyes
my head as if it irked him to see it higher than his own. If it were
off he would seem the taller. I am going home to Arles—with my wife.
The spring is beautiful there, and the Aube runs clean from blood. It
were better to fish its waters than to meddle with the governing of
men."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account