A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia (Volume 1 of 2): The Lepadidae; Or, Pedunculated CirripedesDarwin, Charles
Science
A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia (Volume 1 of 2): The Lepadidae; Or, Pedunculated Cirripedes
Darwin, Charles
Cirripedia; Lepadidae
_Concluding Remarks._--If the creature which I have considered as the
male of _Ibla Cumingii_ be really so, and the evidence formerly given
seems to me amply conclusive, then the animal just described, from its
close affinity in every point of structure with the former, assuredly is
the male of _Ibla quadrivalvis_. But feeling strongly how improbable it
is, that an additional or complemental male should be associated with an
hermaphrodite, I will make a few remarks on the only possible
hypothesis, if my view be rejected,--namely, that the two parasites
considered by me to be exclusively males, are not so, but are
independent hermaphrodite Cirripedes, the female organs and ova (which,
if present, would have been nearly mature, judging from the presence of
spermatozoa in both species) having been overlooked by me in every
specimen: and again, that in the animal described as the female _I.
Cumingii_, I have, though minutely dissecting several specimens, and
finding far smaller parts, such as the organs of sense and nervous
system, entirely overlooked all the conspicuous male organs, though when
I came to _I. quadrivalvis_, and naturally expected to find it likewise
exclusively female, a single glance showed me the great probosciformed
penis, and by the simplest dissection the vesiculæ seminales and testes
were exhibited. Such an oversight is scarcely credible; but even if
assumed, we have to believe in the extraordinary circumstance of the two
parasites being species of an independent genus, not only the very next
in alliance to the animals to which they are attached, but in certain
most important points, namely, the organs of the mouth, actually
deserving a place in the very same genus. Moreover, the two parasites
differ from each other, not only in about the same slight degree, but in
a corresponding manner, as do the two Iblas to which they are attached;
thus the mouths of _Ibla quadrivalvis_ and _I. Cumingii_ are closely
similar, (the difference being barely of specific value,) so are the
mouths of the two parasites; but the parts are larger in the
hermaphrodite _I. quadrivalvis_, than in _I. Cumingii_, so are they in
the parasites. Again, the most conspicuous character in _I.
quadrivalvis_, is the number of segments in the caudal appendages, far
exceeding those in the other species of Ibla, as well as of every other
pedunculated Cirripede, and the parasite of this species has articulated
spinose appendages, far larger than the barely visible, non-articulated
pair in _I. Cumingii_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account