A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia (Volume 2 of 2): The Balanidæ, (or Sessile Cirripedes); the Verrucidæ, etc., etc.Darwin, Charles
Science
A Monograph on the Sub-class Cirripedia (Volume 2 of 2): The Balanidæ, (or Sessile Cirripedes); the Verrucidæ, etc., etc.
Darwin, Charles
Balanidae; Cirripedia
_Var. nitidus_: with respect to this variety I have little to add
to my preliminary remarks on its peculiar appearance, owing to its
smooth, naked condition, and pure white or pale purple colour. This
colour, when examined through a lens, is seen to consist of very
fine longitudinal stripes; and is produced by the calcareous matter
within the longitudinal parietal pores being thus coloured. Generally
the scuta have two longitudinal furrows; but I have seen a scutum
of one perfectly characterised specimen with only a single broad
furrow, like that which frequently occurs in the membrane-covered
variety. _Var. Coquimbensis_, as before stated, differs only in its
greater size: the scutum, in the one specimen examined, had two
broad longitudinal furrows; neither it, nor the tergum differed from
certain varieties now found on the coast of Chile.
17. BALANUS PERFORATUS. Pl. 5, fig. 1 _a_-1 _d_; Pl. 4, fig. 3 _a_-3
_c_.
BALANUS PERFORATUS. _Bruguière._ Encyclop. Meth., 1789, Tab. 164,
fig. 12 _infra_.
LEPAS ANGUSTA. _Gmelin._ Syst. Naturæ, 1789.
---- ORE ANGUSTIORE. _Chemnitz._ Vol. viii, Tab. 98, fig. 835.
BALANUS CORNUBIENSIS CONICO ORE MINORE. _Ellis._ Phil. Trans. vol.
50, 1758, Tab. 34, fig. 16.
LEPAS BALANUS ET FISTULOSUS. _Poli._ Test. Siciliæ (1795), Tab. 4,
fig. 5, Tab. 6, fig. 1.
BALANUS COMMUNIS. _Pulteney._ Dorset Catalogue, 1799.
---- ---- _Montagu._ Test. Brit., 1803.
LEPAS ANGUSTATA. _Wood._ General Conchology, 1815, Pl. 6, fig. 5.
BALANUS CRANCHII. _Leach_ (!). (_B. Blainvillii_ in Tab.) Encyclop.
Brit. Suppl., vol. iii, 1824.
---- ---- _Brown._ Illust. Conch., 1827, Pl. 7, fig. 9, 10, and 2d
Edit., Pl. 53, fig. 9-12.
---- PERFORATUS. _Chenu._ Illust. Conch., Tab. 3, fig. 9, Tab. 6,
fig. 15.[92]
[92] I have very little doubt regarding any of these references:
I have no means of ascertaining the priority, within the same
year, of Gmelin and Bruguière, but have given it to the latter,
as _perforatus_ is much the best known specific name. English
conchologists seem generally to suppose that the _B. communis_ of
Pulteney and Montagu is the _B. porcatus_ of this work; but I have
not the smallest doubt that I have given it rightly as a synonym
of the present species; the indistinctness of the compartments,
the multitude of fine ridges, the smallness of the orifice, the
longitudinal furrow on the terga, the colour, size, and habitat,
all given by Pulteney or Montagu, will agree with no other British
species. The _Lepas balanus_ of Poli, which is certainly a synonym
of our present species, has been erroneously considered by several
authors to be the same with the _L. balanoides_ of Poli, which
latter undoubtedly is the _B. amphitrite_ of this work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account