A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)Bryant, Jacob
History
A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)
Bryant, Jacob
History, Ancient; Mythology
[651]Φοιτων δ' ιφθιμοι Λαιστρυγονες, αλλοθεν αλλος,
Μυριοι, ουκ ανδρεσσιν εοικοτες, αλλα Γιγασι.
Many give an account of the Lestrygons, and Lamiæ, upon the Liris in Italy;
and also upon other parts of that coast: and some of them did settle there.
But they were more particularly to be found in [652]Sicily near Leontium,
as the Scholiast upon Lycophron observes. [653]Λαιστρυγονες, ὁι νυν
Λεοντινοι. _The antient Lestrygons were the people, whose posterity are now
called Leontini_. The same writer takes notice of their incivility to
strangers: [654]Ουκ ησαν ειθισμενοι ξενους ὑποδεχεσθαι. That they were
Amonians, and came originally from Babylonia, is pretty evident from the
history of the Erythrean Sibyl; who was no other than a Lamian priestess.
She is said to have been the daughter of Lamia, who was the daughter of
Poseidon. [655]Σιβυλλαν--Λαμιας ουσαν θυγατερα του Ποσειδωνος. Under the
character of one person is to be understood a priesthood: of which
community each man was called Lamus, and each priestess Lamia. By the Sibyl
being the daughter of Lamia, the daughter of Poseidon, is meant, that she
was of Lamian original, and ultimately descended from the great Deity of
the sea. Who is alluded to under that character, will hereafter be shewn.
The countries, to which the Sibyl is referred, point out her extraction:
for she is said to have come from Egypt, and Babylonia. [656]Ὁι δε αυτην
Βαβυλωνιαν, ἑτεροι δε Σιβυλλαν καλουσιν Αιγυπτιαν. If the Sibyl came from
Babylonia and Egypt, her supposed parent, Lamia, must have been of the same
original.
The Lamiæ were not only to be found in Italy, and Sicily, but Greece,
Pontus, and [657]Libya. And however widely they may have been separated,
they are still represented in the same unfavourable light. Euripides says,
that their very name was detestable.
[658]Τις τ' ουνομα τοδ' επονειδιστον βροτοις
Ουκ οιδε Λαμιας της Λιβυστικης γενος.
Philostratus speaks of their bestial appetite, and unnatural gluttony.
[659]Λαμιας σαρκων, και μαλιστα ανθρωπειων ερᾳν. And Aristotle alludes to
practices still more shocking: as if they tore open the bodies big with
child, that they might get at the infant to devour it. _I speak_, says he,
_of people, who have brutal appetites_. [660]Λεγω δε τας θηριωδεις, ὁιον
την ανθρωπον, την λεγουσι τας κυουσας ανασχιζουσαν τα παιδια κατεσθεειν.
These descriptions are perhaps carried to a great excess; yet the history
was founded in truth: and shews plainly what fearful impressions were left
upon the minds of men from the barbarity of the first ages.
One of the principal places in Italy, where the Lamia seated themselves,
was about Formiæ; of which Horace takes notice in his Ode to Ælius Lamia.
[661]Æli, vetusto nobilis ab Lamo, &c.
Authore ab illo ducis originem,
Qui Formiarum mœnia dicitur
Princeps, et innantem Maricæ
Littoribus tenuisse Lirim.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account