A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)Bryant, Jacob
History
A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6)
Bryant, Jacob
History, Ancient; Mythology
their duty to God. The war of Ninus with Zoroaster of Bactria relates
probably to some hostilities carried on between the Ninevites of Assyria,
and the Bactrians, who had embraced the Zoroastrian rites. Their priest, or
prince, for they were of old the same, was named [988]Oxuartes; but from
his office had the title of Zoroaster; which was properly the name of the
Sun, whom he adored. This religion began in Chaldea; and it is expressly
said of this Bactrian king, that he borrowed the knowledge of it from that
country, and added to it largely. [989]Cujus scientiæ sæculis priscis multa
ex Chaldæorum arcanis Bactrianus addidit Zoroastres. When the Persians
gained the empire in Asia, they renewed these rites, and doctrines.
[990]Multa deinde (addidit) Hystaspes Rex prudentissimus, Darii pater.
These rites were idolatrous; yet not so totally depraved, and gross, as
those of other nations. They were introduced by Chus; at least by the
Cuthites: one branch of whom were the Peresians, or Persians. The Cuthites
of Chaldea were the original Magi, and they gave to Chus the title of
Zoroaster Magus, as being the first of the order. Hence the account given
by Gregorius Turonensis is in a great degree true. [991]Primogeniti Cham
filii Noë fuit Chus. Hic ad Persas transiit, quem Persæ vocitavere
Zoroastrem. Chus, we find, was called by this title; and from him the
religion styled Magia passed to the Persians. But titles, as I have shewn,
were not always determinately appropriated: nor was Chus the original
person, who was called Zoroaster. There was another beyond him, who was the
first deified mortal, and the prototype in this worship. To whom I allude,
may, I think, be known from the history given above. It will not fail of
being rendered very clear in the course of my procedure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account