A Philosophical Essay on ProbabilitiesLaplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Philosophy
A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities
Laplace, Pierre Simon, marquis de
Probabilities
It is principally at games of chance that a multitude of illusions
support hope and sustain it against unfavorable chances. The majority of
those who play at lotteries do not know how many chances are to their
advantage, how many are contrary to them. They see only the possibility
by a small stake of gaining a considerable sum, and the projects which
their imagination brings forth, exaggerate to their eyes the probability
of obtaining it; the poor man especially, excited by the desire of a
better fate, risks at play his necessities by clinging to the most
unfavorable combinations which promise him a great benefit. All would be
without doubt surprised by the immense number of stakes lost if they
could know of them; but one takes care on the contrary to give to the
winnings a great publicity, which becomes a new cause of excitement for
this funereal play.
When a number in the lottery of France has not been drawn for a long
time the crowd is eager to cover it with stakes. They judge since the
number has not been drawn for a long time that it ought at the next
drawing to be drawn in preference to others. So common an error appears
to me to rest upon an illusion by which one is carried back
involuntarily to the origin of events. It is, for example, very
improbable that at the play of heads and tails one will throw heads ten
times in succession. This improbability which strikes us indeed when it
has happened nine times, leads us to believe that at the tenth throw
tails will be thrown. But the past indicating in the coin a greater
propensity for heads than for tails renders the first of the events more
probable than the second; it increases as one has seen the probability
of throwing heads at the following throw. A similar illusion persuades
many people that one can certainly win in a lottery by placing each time
upon the same number, until it is drawn, a stake whose product surpasses
the sum of all the stakes. But even when similar speculations would not
often be stopped by the impossibility of sustaining them they would not
diminish the mathematical disadvantage of speculators and they would
increase their moral disadvantage, since at each drawing they would risk
a very large part of their fortune.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account