15. Par. Nat. Coislin. 25 [xi], 12-3/8 × 9-¼, ff. 254 (36), _prol._, κεφ. _t._, κεφ., τίτλ., _subscr._, στίχ., described by Montfaucon (as were also Act. 16-18), compared with Pamphilus’ revision, _prol._, and a commentary digested by Andreas, a priest (Wetstein). 16. (Paul. 19.) Par. Nat. Coisl. 26 [xi, Greg. x], 11-5/8 × 9, ff. 381 (40), _prol._, with a commentary much like that of Œcumenius, and a catena of various Fathers: also a life of St. Longinus on two leaves [ix]. It once belonged to the monastery of St. Athanasius on Athos, βιβλίον τῆς τετάρτης θέσεως (Wetstein). 17. (Paul. 21, Apoc. 19.) Par. Nat. Coisl. 205 [written by Anthony, a monk, A.D. 1079, Indict. 2], 9-7/8 × 7, ff. 270 (27), _prol._, κεφ. _t._, κεφ., τίτλ., _lect._, _subscr._, στίχ., _syn._ _Mut._ 1 Cor. xvi. 17-2 Cor. i. 7; Heb. xiii. 15-25; with Apoc. i. 1-ii. 5 in a recent hand (Wetstein). 18. (Paul. 22, Apoc. 18.) Par. Nat. Coisl. 202, 2, ff. 1-26 [xi] on vellum, the rest [xiii] on cotton paper, 9-5/8 × 7-1/8, ff. 302 (22), with scholia to the Acts and Catholic Epistles, Andreas’ commentary to the Apocalypse, _prol._ to St. Paul’s Epistles (Wetstein). 19. (Evan. 38.) 20. (Paul. 25.) Brit. Mus. Royal MS. I. B. I, once Westminster 935 [xiv], 10 × 7-¾, ff. 144 (22), _chart._, _Euthal._, _prol._ in Cath. and Paul. _Mut._ and in bad condition, almost illegible in parts (Wetstein). The Pauline Epistles precede the Acts and Catholic Epistles. Casley notices one leaf lost in the Hebrews (after ὡς υἱοῖς ὑμῖν πρός ch. xii. 7). 21. (Paul. 26.) Cambridge, Univ. Libr. Dd. xi. 90 [xiii], 6-½ × 5-¼, ff. 159 (24), _prol._, _lect._, στίχ. _Mut._ Acts i-xii. 2; xiv. 22-xv. 10; Rom. xv. 14-16; 24-26; xvi. 4-20; 1 Cor. i. 15-iii. 12; 2 Tim. i. 1-ii. 4; Tit. i. 9-ii. 15; Philem. ii-end of Hebrews. _Prol._ to Pauline Epistles only, copy is Mill’s _Lu_., but he forgot to name it in his Prolegomena. It was re-discovered and collated by Wetstein, and is probably Bentley’s Q (Ellis, Bentleii Critica Sacra, p. xxix). John Berriman, in the manuscript notes to his own copy of his “Critical Dissertation on 1 Tim. iii. 16” (1741), which he presented to the British Museum in 1761, tells us that this codex [then Cant. 495] was identified “by several collations of many texts by different hands (Professor Francklin and others), and by other circumstances” to have been Professor Luke’s (MS. note on p. 104). 22. (Paul. 75 in the same hand.) Brit. Mus. Add. 5115 and 5116, once Dr. Mead’s (Berriman), then Askew’s [xii], 7-5/8 × 5-¾, ff. 127 + 174 (22), κεφ. _t._, κεφ., _prol._, _syn._, _lect._ (later). _Mut._ Acts i. 1-11: (Acts i-xx collated by Paulus for Griesbach: Bloomfield): Scholz’s date [ix] is an error.