A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
History
A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
National Gallery (Great Britain); Painting -- England -- London -- Catalogs
startle us with penetration in seizing points of individual
character; he charms us with the refinement of his type.
"In Titian," says Ruskin, "it is always the Man whom we see
first; in Van Dyck the Prince or the Sir." With regard to Van
Dyck's technique, his earlier productions (says Sir F. Burton)
"are scarcely to be distinguished from those of Rubens, and
there are cases in which dogmatism as to authorship would be
hazardous.[81] Differentiation is first visible in a greater
precision, a slenderer, it might be said, a more wiry touch,
and a cooler colouring, on the part of the pupil." At its
worst, Van Dyck's touch is distinguished by what Ruskin calls
a certain "flightiness and flimsiness"; at its best, by great
refinement: "there is not a touch of Van Dyck's pencil but he
seems to have revelled in--not grossly, but delicately--tasting
the colour in every touch as an epicure would wine." His
output was prodigious; in spite of his early death more than
1000 works are attributed to him. A considerable portion of
many of these was done by assistants, and his later works
are often hasty and careless. The references to Van Dyck in
Ruskin's books are numerous. (The most interesting are _Modern
Painters_, vol. v. pt. ix. ch. vi. §§ 5, 10, 22; ch. vii. § 23;
_Elements of Drawing_, appendix ii.; _On the Old Road_, i. §
154; _Art of England_, 1884, pp. 43, 83, 138, 212.)
A portrait of special interest as having been much prized by Sir Joshua
Reynolds, to whom it formerly belonged. When Mr. Angerstein bought
it, the great Burke is said to have congratulated him on possessing
Sir Joshua's "favourite picture." It is commonly called "The Portrait
of Rubens," but the principal figure does not greatly resemble the
well-known face of Rubens; it is more probably a portrait of Luke
Vostermann, a celebrated engraver of the time. He is discoursing, it
would seem, on some point of art, suggested by the little statue which
a man behind is holding.
50. ST. AMBROSE AND THEODOSIUS.
_Van Dyck_ (Flemish: 1599-1641). _See under last picture._
A copy, with some variations, of a large picture by Rubens now at
Vienna. The subject is that described by Gibbon (ch. xxvii.). The
Emperor Theodosius, for a massacre of the inhabitants of Thessalonica,
was excommunicated by Ambrose, the Archbishop of Milan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account