A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
History
A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
National Gallery (Great Britain); Painting -- England -- London -- Catalogs
Of Francesco Raibolini's life the two most interesting things
are these: first, that great artist though he came to be,
he never painted a picture, so far as we know, till he was
forty; and secondly, the intimate connection, exemplified in
him, between the artist and the craftsman. He was the son of
a carpenter, and, like so many of the greatest old masters,
was brought up to the goldsmith's trade. The name of Francia
was that of his master in goldsmith's work, and was adopted by
him in gratitude.[101] He attained great skill in his trade,
especially as a die-engraver and a worker in "niello" (inlaying
a black composition into steel or silver). He was appointed
steward of the Goldsmiths' Guild in 1483, and afterwards became
master of the Mint--a post which he held till his death.
In some of his earlier pictures the hand of a goldsmith is
seen--in the clear outline, the metallic and polished surface,
and the minuteness of detail; and even on some of his later
and more important works, such as 179, he signed himself
"Francia _aurifex_ (goldsmith) Bononiensis." It was with Costa,
the Ferrarese artist (see 629), who migrated to Bologna, and
with whom he entered into partnership, that Francia learnt
the art of painting, and thus, though a Bolognese, he is
properly included in the Ferrarese School. His work marks the
culminating point of that school, just as Raphael's[102] marks
that of the Umbrian, and in these pictures (originally one
altar-piece, painted for the Buonvisi chapel in S. Frediano
at Lucca, where, says Vasari, it was held to be of great
value) we have some of his best work. Many of his pictures are
still at Bologna, including the one which some consider his
_chef d'oeuvre_, the Bentivoglio altar-piece in S. Giacomo
Maggiore. Francia is the most pathetic of painters. Raphael
is said to have remarked that Francia's Madonnas were the most
devoutly beautiful he knew,[103] and there is considerable
affinity between Francia and Perugino. But the Umbrian master
was more ideal; in Francia there are touches of realism. "It
will be observed in No. 180 that the Virgin is represented as
a middle-aged woman, and that the lids of the angels' eyes are
red with weeping. In spirit also they are different. Francia
makes his angels appeal to the spectator as if to enlist his
sympathy in the pathos of the tragedy, holding up the beautiful
tresses of Christ's hair to aid in the appeal. This Perugino
would never have done; his angels, and his saints also, are
always wrapt in a spiritual ecstasy to which Francia could not
attain" (Monkhouse: _In the National Gallery_, p. 173).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account