A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
History
A Popular Handbook to the National Gallery, Volume I, Foreign Schools: Including by Special Permission Notes Collected from the Works of John Ruskin
National Gallery (Great Britain); Painting -- England -- London -- Catalogs
"I have seen many cities in my life, and drawn not a few; and
I have seen many fortifications, fancy ones included, which
frequently supply us with very new ideas indeed, especially in
matters of proportion; but I do not remember ever having met
with either a city or a fortress _entirely_ composed of round
towers of various heights and sizes, all facsimiles of each
other, and absolutely agreeing in the number of battlements.
I have, indeed, some faint recollection of having delineated
such a one in the first page of a spelling book when I was four
years old; but, somehow or other, the dignity and perfection
of the ideal were not appreciated, and the volume was not
considered to be increased in value by the frontispiece.
Without, however, venturing to doubt the entire sublimity
of the same ideal as it occurs in Claude, let us consider
how nature, if she had been fortunate enough to originate so
perfect a conception, would have managed it in its details.
Claude has permitted us to see every battlement, and the first
impulse we feel upon looking at the picture is to count how
many there are. Nature would have given us a peculiar confused
roughness of the upper lines, a multitude of intersections
and spots, which we should have known from experience was
indicative of battlements, but which we might as well have
thought of creating as of counting. Claude has given you the
walls below in one dead void of uniform gray. There is nothing
to be seen or felt, or guessed at in it; it is gray paint or
gray shade, whichever you may choose to call it, but it is
nothing more. Nature would have let you see, nay, would have
compelled you to see, thousands of spots or lines, not one
to be absolutely understood or accounted for, but yet all
characteristic and different from each other; breaking lights
on shattered stones, vague shadows from waving vegetation,
irregular stains of time and weather, mouldering hollows,
sparkling casements: all would have been there; none indeed
seen as such, none comprehensible or like themselves, but all
visible; little shadows and sparkles, and scratches, making
that whole space of colour a transparent, palpitating, various
infinity"[49] (_ibid._, ch. v. § 7).
(4) Lastly, the picture entirely ignores truth of _mountains_. And
this in two ways. First, there is a total want of magnitude and aerial
distance:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account