A Popular History of France from the Earliest Times, Volume 6Guizot, François
History
A Popular History of France from the Earliest Times, Volume 6
Guizot, François
France -- History
was supported in this patriotic task by the influence, ever potent in
Poland, of the Czartoriskis. The far-seeing vigilance of Frederick II.
did not give them time to act. “Poland must be left in her lethargy,” he
had said to the Russian ambassador Saldern. “It is of importance,” he
wrote to Catherine, “that Her Majesty the empress, who knows perfectly
well her own interests and those of her friends and allies, should give
orders of the most precise kind to her ambassador at Warsaw, to oppose
any novelty in the form of government, and, generally speaking, the
establishment of a permanent council, the preservation of the commissions
of war and of the treasury, the power of the king and the unlimited
concession on the prince’s part of ability to distribute offices
according to his sole will.” The useful reforms being thus abandoned and
the king’s feeble power radically shaken, religious discord came to fill
up the cup of disorder, and to pave the way for the dismemberment, as
well as definitive ruin, of unhappy Poland.
Subjected for a long time past to an increasing oppression, which was
encouraged by a fanatical and unenlightened clergy, the Polish dissidents
had conceived great hopes on the accession of Stanislaus Augustus; they
claimed not only liberty of conscience and of worship, but also all the
civil and political rights of which they were deprived. “It is no
question of establishing the free exercise of different religions in
Poland,” wrote Frederick to Catherine; “it is necessary to reduce the
question to its true issue, the demand of the dissident noblesse, and
obtain for them the equality they demand, together with participation in
all acts of sovereignty.” This was precisely what the clergy and the
Catholic noblesse were resolved never to grant. In spite of support from
the empress and the King of Prussia, the demand of the dissidents was
formally rejected by the Diet of 1766. At the Diet of 1767, Count
Repnin, Catherine’s ambassador and the real head of the government in
Poland, had four of the most recalcitrant senators carried off and sent
into exile in Russia. The Diet, terrified, disorganized, immediately
pronounced in favor of the dissidents. By the modifications recently
introduced into the constitution of their country, the Polish nobles had
lost their liberum veto; unanimity of suffrages was no longer necessary
in the Diet; the foreign powers were able to insolently impose their will
upon it; the privileges of the noblesse, as well as their traditional
faith, were attacked at the very foundations; religious fanaticism and
national independence boiled up at the same time in every heart; the
discontent, secretly fanned by the agents of Frederick, burst out, sooner
than the skilful weavers of the plot could have desired, with sufficient
intensity and violence to set fire to the four corners of Poland. By a
bold surprise the confederates gained possession of Cracow and of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account