A popular history of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b from the discovery of the American continent to the present timeHowitt, Mary (Mary Botham)
History
A popular history of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b from the discovery of the American continent to the present time
Howitt, Mary (Mary Botham)
United States -- History
We have already related how the adventurous La Salle, when endeavouring
to establish a colony at the mouth of the Mississippi, mistook his
reckoning, and entered the bay of Matagorda instead. This gave the
French nation a claim to Texas. The fort built by the unfortunate La
Salle was soon demolished by the Indians, and the Spaniards from their
neighbouring Mexico disputed also the French right of possession, they
claiming the whole of this coast as a portion of their own territory.
The first permanent settlement of the whites in Texas was by the
Spaniards, in 1684, when, under San Antonio de Bexar, the fort of that
name was established. In 1719 also a colony settled there from the
Canary Isles. Various missionary stations and military posts were also
established at different places, so that the Spaniards became the
assured possessors of the country, with an increasing population. The
missionary stations, unlike the simple log-huts and chapels of the early
French jesuits, were massive fortresses of stone, the churches decorated
with images of saints and paintings, and surmounted by enormous towers.
The ruins of several of these vast erections still remain in various
parts of Texas, and produce a very striking effect, especially in a
country where the traces of civilised life are so scanty. The Spanish
population of Texas was, however, inconsiderable at the time of the
Mexican revolution in 1810, owing to the incursions of the savage
Comanches and other Indian tribes, and to the police regulations of the
Spanish government. As regards the relative positions and feelings of
the Mexican government and that of the United States, we will give a few
remarks from an American writer.[82] “The Mexican authorities were not
so desirous of occupying Texas as of keeping her a desolate waste; that
she might present an impassable barrier between themselves and their
Anglo-American neighbours. The cause of this is not of difficult
solution, and is derived from the old mother-country. At the time when
Mexico was first colonised, Spain was at the head of the Roman Catholic
countries, and all heretics were held in abhorrence by her, and
exterminated by the inquisition and the sword. The changes which
knowledge and general enlightenment have produced in the Protestant
world universally, and even in the Catholic when it has been forced into
closer contact with progressive opinion, have not reached Mexico, which
has been shut up as it were, and which has jealously retained all her
native aversions, prejudices and jealousies. Besides which, Mexico as a
colony belonged less to the Spanish nation than to the Spanish kings,
and was governed by their viceroys, regardless of the well-being of the
people, merely as an estate to produce a revenue. No possible rivalry
with the mother-country was permitted; meanwhile the mines were
industriously worked, no commerce was permitted to the Mexicans, nor
might they rear the silkworm or plant the olive or the vine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account