A Practical Treatise on Gas-light: Exhibiting a Summary Description of the Apparatus and Machinery Best Calculated for Illuminating Streets, Houses, and Manufactories, with Carburetted Hydrogen, or Coal-Gas, with Remarks on the Utility, Safety, and General Nature of this new Branch of Civil Economy.Accum, Friedrich Christian
Science
A Practical Treatise on Gas-light: Exhibiting a Summary Description of the Apparatus and Machinery Best Calculated for Illuminating Streets, Houses, and Manufactories, with Carburetted Hydrogen, or Coal-Gas, with Remarks on the Utility, Safety, and General Nature of this new Branch of Civil Economy.
Accum, Friedrich Christian
Candles; Gas-lighting
It is thus that coke, though somewhat more difficult of ignition than
common coal, always gives out a more steady, a more lasting, and a more
intense heat.
The only inconveniences that attend the use of coke is, that, as it
consumes, it leaves much more ashes than common coal, charcoal, or wood;
and these much heavier too, which are, therefore, liable to collect in
such quantity as to obstruct the free passage of air through the fire;
and further, that when the heat is _very intense_, these ashes are
disposed to melt or vitrify into a tenacious drossy substance, which
clogs the grate, the sides of the furnace and the vessels. This last
inconvenience is only troublesome, however, when the heat required is
very great. In ordinary heats, such as are produced by kitchen or
parlour grates, the ashes do not melt, and though they are more copious
and heavy than those of charcoal or wood, they do not choke up the
fire, unless the bars of the grate be too close together.
The relative effects of heat produced by coke and coal are as follows:--
Six hundred pounds of pit-coal are capable of evaporating 10 cubic feet
of water in 20 hours, and 430lb. of coke are capable of evaporating 17
cubic feet of water in 12 hours and a half.[28]
[28] In order to learn the relative effect of different kinds of fuel,
with regard to their capability of producing heat, chemistry teaches
that equal quantities of fuel alike expended, will raise the
temperature of a given quantity of water through the same number of
degrees; whence, by knowing the original quantity and temperature of
water, together with the quantity of fuel expended to raise the water
to the boiling point, the result sought may be expressed by stating
the quantity of water at 30 degrees, which would have been raised 180
degrees by one pound of the fuel employed; or in the form of a rule,
Multiply the quantity of water by the number expressing the degrees
actually raised; multiply the number of pounds of fuel expended by 180
degrees. Divide the first product by the latter, and the quotient will
express the water which would have been raised 180 degrees by one
pound of the fuel. Or equal quantities of water may be compleatly
evaporated under equal surfaces and circumstances, with the different
kinds of fuel, the nature of which is to be examined; the quantities
of fuel expended for that purpose give the relative effect of the
different kinds of fuel, with regard to their power of producing
heat.
The Earl of Dundonald has shown that, in the application for burning
lime, a quantity of coke uniformly burns a given portion of lime-stone
in one-third part of the time that the quantity of coal from which the
coke had been made could do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account