But because the teaching of the sages was incomprehensible, the
multitude, impressed but also bewildered, ignored them as teachers and
worshipped them as gods. [p201] In their wisdom the people were not
interested, but in the legends of their power, which rumor created,
there was something understandable. And thus, the religions which have
been organized around the names of great spiritual teachers have been
popular in proportion, one might almost say, to the degree in which the
original insight into the necessity for conversion and self-discipline
has been reduced to a system of commands and promises which the common
man can understand.
For popular religion is suited to the capacities of the unconverted.
The adherents of a popular religion necessarily include an enormous
number of people who are too young, or too feeble, too dull or too
violent, too unstable or too incurious, to have any comprehension
whatsoever of anything but the simplest scheme of rewards and
punishments. An organized religion cannot neglect them if it has any
pretensions to being universal. The great ecclesiastical establishments
have often sheltered spiritual lives, and drawn new vitality from
them. But fundamentally the great churches are secular institutions;
they are governments preoccupied inevitably with the regulation of
the unregenerate appetites of mankind. In their scriptures there is
to be found the teaching that true salvation depends upon internal
reform of desire. But since this reform is so very difficult, in
practice the churches have devoted themselves not so much to making
real conversions, as to governing the dispositions of the unconverted
multitude.
They are immensely engaged by the task of administering their moral
codes, persuading their congregations with promises, and threatening
them with punishments [p202] if they do not keep their childish
lusts within bounds. The fact that they use rewards and punishments,
and appeal even to Caesar, is evidence enough that they are dealing
with the unconverted. The fact that they invoke authority is in
itself evidence that they are speaking to the naive. The fact that
they pretend to have certain knowledge about the constitution of the
universe is evidence that they are interested in those who are not wise
enough to understand the limitations of knowledge. For to the few who
are converted, goodness is pleasant, and needs no sanctions. It needs
no authority, for it has been verified by experience. But when men have
to be coerced into goodness, it is plain that they do not care for it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account