In the Christian pursuit of the higher religious life the practical
difficulties presented themselves in a different way. In its beginning
Christianity was a sect of obscure men and women who were out of
touch with the intellectual interests of the Roman world. They were
persecuted aliens both in Palestine and elsewhere, and they came to
the conclusion that the Roman Empire and all its concerns was the
Kingdom of Satan. This, together with the widespread belief in the
Second Coming of Christ, dissociated the Christian life at the outset
from the life of the world. Later on, when Christianity became the
official religion of the Empire, and the Church a great [p206] secular
institution which concerned itself with government and property and
diplomacy and war, those who wished to live as nearly as possible
according to the original meaning of the Gospels were quite evidently
compelled to withdraw and live a separated life. “If any man love the
world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the
world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride
of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world
passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God
abideth forever.”
Although for some centuries the monasteries were the centers of what
learning there was, the impressions left by monasticism on mankind
seems to have been that the highest type of religious life is not
disinterested in human affairs, but uninterested; that it requires not
merely the renunciation of worldly desires, but of the world itself.
The insight was imperfect, and therefore as an example to mankind the
practice was abortive and confusing. Yet only an uncomprehending person
can fail to see that the vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience
proceeded from a profound, if partial, understanding of human nature
and its most perfect harmony. Plainly all manner of disorder both in
society and in the individual result from greed, uncontrollable sexual
desire, arrogance, and imperiousness. That was so plain to the early
Christians, and on the other hand it was so little plain how those
powerful passions could be civilized, that the monastics in effect gave
up and attempted to excise them entirely from their natures. In this
they did not succeed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account