The criminal laws depend upon how earnestly citizens object
to certain kinds of crime. In fact it may be said that laws which make
certain kinds of conduct illicit are effective insofar as the breach
of these laws arouses the citizenry to call in the police and to take
the trouble to help the police. It is not enough that the mass of the
population should be law-abiding. A minority can stultify the law if
the population as a whole is not also law-enforcing.
This is the real sense in which it can be said that power in the modern
state resides not in the government but in the people. As that phrase
is usually employed it alleges that ‘the people,’ as articulated by
elected officials, can govern by command as the monarch or tribal
chieftain once governed. In this sense government by the people is a
delusion. What we have among advanced communities is something that
might perhaps be described as government in the people. The naively
democratic theory was that out of the mass of the voters there arose a
cloud of wills which ascended to heaven, condensed into a thunderbolt,
and then smote the people. It was supposed that the opinion of masses
of persons somehow became the opinion of a corporate person called The
People, and that this corporate person then directed human affairs like
a monarch. But that is not what happens. Government is in the people
and stays there. Government is [p279] their multitudinous decisions in
concrete situations, and what officials do is to assist and facilitate
this process of governing. Effective laws may be said to register an
understanding among those concerned by which the law-abiding know
what to expect and what is expected of them; they are insured with
all the force that the state commands against the disruption of this
understanding by the recalcitrant minority. In the modern state a law
which does not register the inward assent of most of those who are
affected will have very little force as against the breakers of that
law. For it is only by that inward assent that power becomes mobilized
to enforce the law. The government in the person of its officials, its
paltry inspectors and policemen, has relatively little power of its
own. It derives its power from the people in amounts which vary with
the circumstances of each law. That is why the same government may act
with invincible majesty in one place and with ludicrous futility in
another.
6. _Politicians and Statesmen_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account