This much the transcendentalists understand well enough. They do
not wish to isolate the satisfaction of desire from our “finest
and most exalted activities.” They would make it “the stimulus and
the liberator” of these activities. They would use it to arouse to
“wholesome activity all the complex and interrelated systems of the
organism.” But what are these finest and most exalted activities which
are to be stimulated and liberated? The discovery of truth, the making
of works of art, meditation and insight? Mr. Ellis does not specify. If
these are the activities that are meant, then the discussion applies to
a very few of the men and women on earth. For the activities of most
of them are necessarily concerned with earning a living and managing
a household and rearing children and finding recreation. If the art
of love is to stimulate and liberate activities, it is these prosaic
activities which it must stimulate and liberate. But if you idealize
the logic of birth control, make parenthood a separate vocation,
isolate love from work and the hard realities of living, and say that
it must be spontaneous and carefree, what have you done? You have
separated [p306] it from all the important activities which it might
stimulate and liberate. You have made love spontaneous but empty, and
you have made home-building and parenthood efficient, responsible, and
dull.
What has happened, I believe, is what so often happens in the first
enthusiasm for a revolutionary invention. Its possibilities are so
dazzling that men forget that inventions belong to man and not man to
his inventions. In the discussion which has ensued since birth control
became generally feasible, the central confusion has been that the
reformers have tried to fix their sexual ideals in accordance with the
logic of birth control instead of the logic of human nature. Birth
control does make feasible this dissociation of interests which were
once organically united. There are undoubtedly the best of reasons
for dissociating them up to a point. But how completely it is wise
to dissociate them is a matter to be determined not by saying how
completely it is possible to dissociate them, but how much it is
desirable to dissociate them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account