Colorado -- Fiction; Gamblers -- Fiction; Love stories; Redemption -- Fiction; Western stories
“The answers to two or three questions first, and then, if there is any
fight left in you, we’ll see about the thrashing.”
“Go ahead. What is it you want to know?” said the aforetime bondsman of
reticence.
“A lot of things that you can’t tell me, and some few that you can. Did
you at one time have a gun--a Colt’s forty-five--that had once belonged
to Harding?”
Brant lost levity and freedom of speech in the dropping of an eyelid,
but he could not in common fairness refuse to answer.
“I did.”
“Did you have this admirable weapon about you on the night of the
shooting?”
“No.”
“Where was it at that time?”
“I don’t know.”
“I think I do know,” said the cross-examiner placidly. “You had lost
it, hadn’t you?”
“Yes.”
“I thought so. Now I am going to hazard a guess--dang the thing! it’s
all guesses, so far--and I shall know if I’ve hit it whether you admit
it or not. You left that gun in your room the night of the burglary,
and you haven’t seen it since.”
Brant did not attempt to deny it. “That is also true,” he admitted.
“So far, so good. Now, do you know who it was who broke into your room,
and slept in your bed, and stole your artillery?”
“I think I do, but I don’t care to discuss that point with you.”
“You needn’t, if you don’t want to. But it will be discussed in open
court next week.”
Brant’s start was not lost upon the young man, who had apparently
missed his vocation in electing to be a journalist rather than a
detective.
“Why should it come up at the trial?” Brant demanded.
“Because it is going to have a very considerable bearing on the case,”
said Jarvis coolly. “The man who took the pistol from your room gave it
back to Harding.”
“How do you know he did?”
Jarvis leered. “He did, or he didn’t; one of the two. I believe he
didn’t.”
“More theories,” said Brant, not without sarcasm. “What difference does
it make?”
“It makes all the difference in the world when you come to tie it to
the fact that Harding was killed with that same weapon.”
This time Brant’s start was visible to the naked eye of the least
critical observer, but his rejoinder was well measured and calm:
“What is your theory? Set it in words.”
Jarvis settled himself on the cot, nursing one knee in his clasped
hands and chewing an extinct cigar. “It’s as simple as twice two. You
heard young Langford’s testimony at the preliminary examination?”
“Naturally, being within a few feet of him when he gave it.”
“Very good. You were in that card room at the Osirian and saw what he
saw. Did he tell the truth?”
Brant was silent.
“You know he didn’t tell the truth; or, at least, he didn’t tell all
of it,” Jarvis went on. “He said that Harding drew a pistol on him,
but he did not say that he had already drawn his own. Also, he left
the inference wide open that the big pistol on the table, the pistol
from which the shot was fired, was Harding’s--that Harding had laid it
there. That wasn’t so.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account