A Report upon the Mollusk Fisheries of MassachusettsMassachusetts. Commissioners on Fisheries and Game
Science
A Report upon the Mollusk Fisheries of Massachusetts
Massachusetts. Commissioners on Fisheries and Game
Shellfish fisheries -- Massachusetts
Dr. G. W. Field, chairman of this department, in his report in 1902
as biologist to the Charles River Dam Commission, makes the following
statement about the Charles River oyster:--
The oyster (_Ostrea_), formerly abundant, is no longer living,
and, from what indications I have been able to gather, probably
became extinct within twenty-five years. Their dead shells are
brought up by dredging operations. Their peculiar elongated
shape is the result of growth being concentrated at the upper
end, as a result of their closely crowded position in the bed,
or of an attempt to keep the opening above the accumulating
mud, and thus avoid being smothered. The fact that there are
few signs of small "seed oysters" tends to prove that the
bottom was so muddy that they found few places to "set." From
the elongated shape of the shells may be inferred that the
amount of sedimentation going on in that particular region
was rapid during the life of the group of oysters whose
shells are to be found in quantities in the material dredged
between Harvard and Brookline bridges. This sediment need not
necessarily have been sand or clay, or any material which is
persistent, but it might have been flocculent organic débris,
which remained but a short time and left little or no evidence,
beyond its effect upon the shape of the oyster shells.
In the above account Dr. Field not only locates the original oyster
beds of Charles River, but also furnishes evidence which indicates the
cause of their extinction, _i.e._, the débris and sewage, or waste
poisonous, polluting materials, of a large city emptying into the
river. This is not only true of the Charles, but also of the Mystic and
Taunton river beds, which have been destroyed in like manner.
(3) Mr. Ernest Ingersoll, in his report on the "Oyster Industry of the
United States," in 1880 mentions that natural oyster beds were once
at Weymouth, Ipswich, Barnstable and Rowley. Nothing further can be
learned concerning these places.
(4) _Wellfleet._--An extensive oyster bed was found at Wellfleet Bay,
which not only furnished a sufficient supply for the first settlers,
but enabled the inhabitants of Wellfleet to carry on a considerable
trade by shipping them to Boston and other ports, until it was finally
destroyed in 1775. Its destruction was due to overfishing and the
utilization of the shells for lime, which soon destroyed the natural
bar.
(5) _Chatham._--A natural oyster bed once existed in the Oyster Pond,
but no trace of it now remains.
(6) _Harwich._--Herring River in the town of Harwich still possesses
the remnants of a natural oyster bed, as occasionally a few oysters
can be gathered along its banks. This bed once comprised a stretch of
three-quarters of a mile along the river.
(7) _Yarmouth._--The town of Yarmouth once possessed a natural oyster
bed in Mill Creek, but this was fished out by 1895 and then granted for
oyster culture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account