A rough sketch of modern Paris : $b or, Letters on society, manners, public curiosities, and amusements, in that capitalLemaistre, J. G. (John Gustavus)
History
A rough sketch of modern Paris : $b or, Letters on society, manners, public curiosities, and amusements, in that capital
Lemaistre, J. G. (John Gustavus)
Paris (France) -- Description and travel
You have, doubtless, been surprised, that I have not in any of my letters
spoken of theatres, or _spectacles_ as they are called at Paris. I
purposely omitted doing so, till I had had an opportunity of seeing the
greater part of those which are now in vogue, that I might place them all
before you at one view.
“Le théâtre françois de la république,” formerly called, “le théâtre du
roi,” situate in la rue de la Loi, ci-devant de Richelieu, deservedly
takes the lead. It is here, where the tragedies of Racine, Corneille,
and Voltaire, are constantly acted; and where also the best comedies
on the french stage are represented. The most celebrated performers
in the tragic line are, Talma, and la Fond, among the men; and madame
Pettit, (otherwise called, mademoiselle Vanhove,) mademoiselle Volney,
and mademoiselle Burgoing, among the women. Talma and la Fond have
each their admirers, and it is a disputed matter in society to which
the palm is due. The same thing may be said of the actresses. In some
circles, madame Pettit is commended as a performer of very extraordinary
talents, highly superiour to her competitors; in others, mademoiselle
Volney is the favourite; and lately, mademoiselle Burgoing has disputed
the victory with both. It is presumptuous perhaps, in a foreigner, to
form a judgment on a subject on which natives are divided. I shall only
say, that to my english ear, the roaring declamation, common to all the
french tragedians, is dreadfully offensive. I must add, that I have
more than once mistaken the violence of their action for bombast, and
the perpetual motion of their features for grimace. After making this
candid avowal, I do not deserve or expect any credit for the judgment
I am about to pronounce. I think Talma less bad than la Fond; but such
is the difference of national taste, that I am sure neither of them
would be suffered on an english stage. I entertain the same opinion
of madame Pettit, and mademoiselle Volney, though the latter is to my
mind, infinitely superiour to the former. As to mademoiselle Burgoing,
she has the great merit of being natural; and it is for this reason,
I suppose, that in several of the newspapers here, she is accused of
being cold and insipid. I saw her perform “Zaire” a few evenings since,
and I never remember to have been more amused. She is a beautiful young
girl of sixteen, with a fine expressive countenance, and an elegant
graceful figure. Her voice is clear and articulate; her manner simple
and unaffected; and her representation of the different passions strong
and impressive, without “outstepping the modesty of nature.” Her dress
was elegantly simple, and her deportment truly correct. After the play,
“Zaire” was called for again and again, (this is the highest compliment
which can be paid to a performer at Paris) and it was long before she
could be persuaded to appear. At length the curtain drew up, and Talma
led her, “still unwilling,” towards the audience. She seemed really
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account