A scrap of paper : $b The inner history of German diplomacy and her scheme of world-wide conquestDillon, Emile Joseph
History
A scrap of paper : $b The inner history of German diplomacy and her scheme of world-wide conquest
Dillon, Emile Joseph
Germany -- Foreign relations; World War, 1914-1918
The answer is that she would unquestionably have done so. Sir
Edward Grey, as recorded in the White Paper, asked the French
Government “whether it was prepared to engage to respect the
neutrality of Belgium so long as no other Power violates it.” The
French Government replied that they were resolved to respect it.
The assurance, it was added, had been given several times, and
formed the subject of conversation between President Poincaré and
the King of the Belgians.
The German Chancellor entirely ignores the fact that England took
the same line about Belgian neutrality in 1870 that she has taken
now. In 1870 Prince Bismarck, when approached by England on the
subject, admitted and respected the treaty obligations in relation
to Belgium. The British Government stands in 1914 as it stood in
1870; it is Herr von Bethmann-Hollweg who refused to meet us in
1914 as Prince Bismarck met us in 1870.
“NOT VERY TACTFUL.”
The Imperial Chancellor finds it strange that Mr. Asquith in his
Guildhall speech did not mention the neutrality of the Scandinavian
countries, and suggests that the reason for the omission was some
sinister design on England’s part. It is impossible for any public
speaker to cover the whole ground in each speech.
The German Chancellor’s reference to Denmark and other Scandinavian
countries can hardly be considered very tactful. With regard to
Denmark, the Danes are not likely to have forgotten the parts
played by Prussia and England respectively in 1863–4, when the
Kingdom of Denmark was dismembered. And the integrity of Norway
and Sweden was guaranteed by England and France in the Treaty of
Stockholm in 1855.
The Imperial Chancellor refers to the dealings of Great Britain
with the Boer Republics, and suggests that she has been false
therein to the cause of freedom.
Without going into controversies now happily past, we may recall
what General Botha said in the South African Parliament a few
days ago, when expressing his conviction of the righteousness
of Britain’s cause and explaining the firm resolve of the South
African Union to aid her in every possible way: “Great Britain had
given them a Constitution under which they could create a great
nationality, and had ever since regarded them as a free people and
as a sister State. Although there might be many who in the past had
been hostile towards the British flag, he could vouch for it that
they would ten times rather be under the British than under the
German flag.”
COLONIAL LOYALTY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account