Adventure and adventurers -- Fiction; Short stories
end of the day the duel of the morning was talked over from every point of
view. Though Lieut. D’Hubert had got worsted this time, his sword play was
commended. No one could deny that it was very close, very scientific. It
was even whispered that if he got touched it was because he wished to
spare his adversary. But by many the vigour and dash of Lieut. Feraud’s
attack were pronounced irresistible.
</p>
<p>
The merits of the two officers as combatants were frankly discussed; but
their attitude to each other after the duel was criticised lightly and
with caution. It was irreconcilable, and that was to be regretted. But
after all they knew best what the care of their honour dictated. It was
not a matter for their comrades to pry into over-much. As to the origin of
the quarrel, the general impression was that it dated from the time they
were holding garrison in Strasbourg. The musical surgeon shook his head at
that. It went much farther back, he thought.
</p>
<p>
“Why, of course! You must know the whole story,” cried several voices,
eager with curiosity. “What was it?”
</p>
<p>
He raised his eyes from his glass deliberately. “Even if I knew ever so
well, you can’t expect me to tell you, since both the principals choose to
say nothing.”
</p>
<p>
He got up and went out, leaving the sense of mystery behind him. He could
not stay any longer, because the witching hour of flute-playing was
drawing near.
</p>
<p>
After he had gone a very young officer observed solemnly, “Obviously, his
lips are sealed!”
</p>
<p>
Nobody questioned the high correctness of that remark. Somehow it added to
the impressiveness of the affair. Several older officers of both
regiments, prompted by nothing but sheer kindness and love of harmony,
proposed to form a Court of Honour, to which the two young men would leave
the task of their reconciliation. Unfortunately they began by approaching
Lieut. Feraud, on the assumption that, having just scored heavily, he
would be found placable and disposed to moderation.
</p>
<p>
The reasoning was sound enough. Nevertheless, the move turned out
unfortunate. In that relaxation of moral fibre, which is brought about by
the ease of soothed vanity, Lieut. Feraud had condescended in the secret
of his heart to review the case, and even had come to doubt not the
justice of his cause, but the absolute sagacity of his conduct. This being
so, he was disinclined to talk about it. The suggestion of the regimental
wise men put him in a difficult position. He was disgusted at it, and this
disgust, by a paradoxical logic, reawakened his animosity against Lieut.
D’Hubert.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account