A short history of architectureTuckerman, Arthur Lyman
History
A short history of architecture
Tuckerman, Arthur Lyman
Architecture -- History
We have seen that the best period of Gothic art was that wherein the
whole structure was raised on a theory of weights and strains thrown
from vault to pier, and pier to buttress; it is, therefore, absurd, when
a building occupies a space between the party-walls of modern street
lots, to attempt an interior construction having the appearance of
corresponding with buttresses and similar contrivances for which there is
no room on the outside.
If, therefore, we choose Gothic for our style, let us follow no false
theory, but work on the principles demonstrated in its innumerable
examples, in which it may be possible to find room for further
development, introducing no feature of construction which has not a full
and consistent meaning.
One can scarcely go the lengths to which many venture, in saying that
Gothic architecture is suited only to ecclesiastical buildings, for
there are many splendid military and civil structures, from the keeps
and castles of England and France, to the town-halls of Belgium. But
there is this much to be said in their favour, that while the laws of
fortification and domestic life have altered entirely since the Middle
Ages, on the one hand, those governing the observances of religion have
remained unchanged and no manner of building is so essentially religious
in its character or better calculated to command the reverence and awe of
the devotee, on the other.
In support of this view many will agree in admitting that there is
nothing of this religious sentiment expressed in the Corinthian
colonnades of St. Peter’s, or, in fact, in any of the great number of
Renaissance churches which are scattered throughout the cities of Europe,
while it never fails to exercise its influence upon anyone entering the
great Gothic cathedrals.
The great prevailing thought of Mediæval times was a religious one, and
we see it reflected in the minutest details of the lives of the people
of that age; it was, consequently, but natural that it should attain its
highest expression when they filled their churches with the best that
could be produced in architecture, sculpture, and painting. While the
Classic orders seem out of place in a temple of Christian worship they
are appropriate in civil buildings, and we have no better examples for
beauty of proportion. They are the result of the thought and taste of
generations of architects and have stood the test of time, for they are
as pleasing to-day as in the days of ancient Greece and Rome.
It is their proportion rather than their component parts which we should
follow, for a column, unless needed as a support, is a questionable
decoration, and pilasters or engaged columns are only desirable where
additional thickness of wall is required, used as the Gothic architect
would have used buttresses, and never as mere ornaments, which are
at once a fraudulent delusion and a retrogression in the progress of
architecture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account