Belgium -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Belgium
The Hapsburgs of Austria were not to be regarded as foreign conquerors
of Belgium. From the outset they had claimed to be the natural heirs
of the Hapsburgs of Spain, and that claim was admitted by France,
England, and Holland, and by the States-General of the Belgian
provinces. There could be no question of Austrian “domination.” In
their relation to Belgium the Hapsburgs assumed the title of natural
prince, as did Charles V at the beginning of the sixteenth century.
Moreover, by the Treaty of the Barriers, Charles VI of Austria publicly
proclaimed that his house assumed the rule over Belgium, subject to
all the restrictions and guaranties to which the Hapsburgs of Spain
had been subject. According to the treaties, Belgium was ceded to the
Austrian Hapsburgs on condition that the predominance of the Catholic
church in the country as well as the rights of the states and cities
be recognized. The Catholic church and its position as the religion
of the state were to be respected on account of the desire of France
to erect a moral and religious barrier between herself and Protestant
Holland; the popular rights were to be respected because the theory
of the European balance of power required that the Emperor should be
permitted only a limited sway. A strong, universal monarchy was no
longer possible in Europe.
The theory of the European balance of power had found expression
through the Treaty of Westphalia (1648), whereby Europe ceased to be
exclusively and officially Catholic, and Protestantism was granted
recognition in law. Since the arbitration of the Pope in international
matters was no longer possible, owing to the refusal of the Protestant
powers to acknowledge his decisions, each country had to rely only upon
itself. The weaker states had only one protection, therefore, namely,
to unite against any power which might try to absorb them. Out of these
principles grew the idea of the European balance of power, according to
which no state was to be allowed to grow strong enough to menace the
peace of the world.
The external constitution of Belgium under Austrian rule having been
established, Charles VI proceeded to protect the rights of his family
in respect to internal conditions. As Charles V had established the
principle of the indivisibility of the Spanish Netherlands by the
Augsburg transaction, already mentioned, the new Emperor established
the same principle for the “Austrian Netherlands” by a similar act,
the “Pragmatic Sanction” of 1725. Belgium was forever to be kept as an
indivisible whole, the eldest son to be heir to the throne, and the
right of succession of the female descendants in case of the failure of
a male heir was again admitted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account