Belgium -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Belgium
This time Holland was unwilling to yield, and the Dutch refused to
evacuate the territory they occupied, especially the citadel of
Antwerp. A French army, under Gérard, marched for the second time into
Belgium, besieged the Antwerp stronghold, and forced the Dutch to
capitulate (1832). King William continued to refuse to subscribe to
any agreement until 1838. Then, suddenly, he gave his adherence to the
Twenty-four Articles. The Conference of London met again and, on April
18, 1839, the final Treaty of London was signed. The Belgians were
given a large reduction in what was agreed should be their contribution
to the debt of the Netherlands, but were forced to surrender the
territories agreed upon by the treaty of 1831. They did it very
reluctantly, but had no other choice.
This Treaty of London is the famous “scrap of paper” of which the
German chancellor spoke so disdainfully on August 14, 1914. It
settled the external relations of Belgium in Europe. By that treaty,
Belgium was declared to be an independent kingdom and was to remain
“a perpetually neutral state,” under the guaranty of the five great
powers. The neutrality of Belgium had been imposed upon the new kingdom
at the instance chiefly of England, who desired above all to maintain
it as a bulwark against France. As King Leopold I himself writes to
Queen Victoria on February 15, 1852, “this neutrality was in the real
interest of this country, but our good congress here did _not_ wish it:
it was _imposé_ upon them.”
Owing to the fact that so much has been said about the neutrality of
Belgium since the beginning of the European war, it seems worth while
to explain briefly what ought to be understood by the words “permanent
neutrality,” used by the Conference of London.[22]
Article VII of the Treaty of London declares: “Belgium, within the
limits specified in Articles I, II, and IV, shall form an independent
and _perpetually neutral_ state. It shall be bound to observe such
neutrality toward all other states.” A distinction must be made between
the neutrality imposed by this article on Belgium and the occasional
neutrality of a state, which during a war between other powers wishes
to avoid the conflict and, in a perfectly voluntary manner, proclaims
that decision to the world. In the recent European war, the United
States of America observed such an “occasional” neutrality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account