A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
There still attaches to the investigation of early Greek philosophy
the drawback that the philosophical scholars do not properly posit
the question: What was the early Ionic Greek society like? How did
the Hellenes relate to the older polities and cultures which they
found there? Professor Burnet makes justifiable fun (p. 21, note)
of Dr. Gomperz's theory of the influence of "native brides"; but he
himself seems to argue that the Greeks could learn nothing from the
men they conquered, though he admits (p. 20) their derivation of
"their art and many of their religious ideas from the East." If
religion, why not religious speculation, leading to philosophy
and science? This would be a more fruitful line of inquiry than
one based on the assumption that "the" Babylonians went one way
and "the" Greeks another. After all, only a few in each race
carried on the work of thought and discovery. We do not say that
"the English" wrote Shakespeare. Why affirm always that "the"
Greeks did whatever great Greeks achieved?
On the immediate issue Professor Burnet incidentally concedes what
is required. After arguing that the East perhaps borrowed more
from the West than did the West from the East, he admits (p. 21):
"It would, however, be quite another thing to say that Greek
philosophy originated quite independently of Oriental influence."
§ 1
By the tacit admission of one of the ablest opponents of the theory
of foreign influence, Hellenic religion as fixed by Homer for the
Hellenic world was partly determined by Asiatic influences. Ottfried
Müller decided not only that Homer the man (in whose personality he
believed) was probably a Smyrnean, whether of Æolic or Ionic stock,
[414] but that Homer's religion must have represented a special
selection from the manifold Greek mythology, necessarily representing
his local bias. [415] Now, the Greek cults at Smyrna, as in the other
Æolic and Ionic cities of Asia Minor, would be very likely to reflect
in some degree the influence of the Karian or other Asiatic cults
around them. [416] The early Attic conquerors of Miletos allowed
the worship of the Karian Sun-God there to be carried on by the old
priests; and the Attic settlers of Ephesos in the same way adopted the
neighbouring worship of the Lydian Goddess (who became the Artemis
or "Great Diana" of the Ephesians), and retained the ministry of
the attendant priests and eunuchs. [417] Smyrna was apparently not
like these a mixed community, but one founded by Achaians from the
Peloponnesos; but the genera] Ionic and Æolic religious atmosphere,
set up by common sacrifices, [418] must have been represented in an
epic brought forth in that region. The Karian civilization had at
one time spread over a great part of the Ægean, including Delos and
Cyprus. [419] Such a civilization must have affected that of the Greek
conquerors, who only on that basis became civilized traders. [420]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account