A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 1 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
The conventional view is thus set forth in a popular work (The
Saracens, by Arthur Gilman, 1887, p. 385): "Unconsciously Mamun
began a process by which that implicit faith which had been
at once the foundation and the inspiration of Islam, which had
nerved its warriors in their terrible warfare, and had brought
the nation out of its former obscurity to the foremost position
among the peoples of the world, was to be taken from them." We
have seen that this view is entirely erroneous as regards the
rise of the Saracen power; and it is no less so as regards
the decline. At the outset there had been no "implicit faith"
among the conquerors. The Eastern Saracens, further, had been
decisively defeated by the Byzantines in the very first flush of
their fanaticism and success; and the Western had been routed by
Charles Martel long before they had any philosophy. There was
no overthrow of faith among the warriors of the Khalifate. The
enlistment of Turkish mercenaries by Mamoun and Motasim, by way of
being independent of the Persian and Arab factions in the army and
the State, introduced an element which, at first purely barbaric,
became as orthodox as the men of Haroun's day had been. Yet the
decadence, instead of being checked, was furthered.
Nor were the strifes set up by the rationalistic view of the Koran
nearly so destructive as the mere faction-fights and sectarian
insurrections which began with Motawakkel. The falling-away
of cities and provinces under the feeble Moktader (908-932)
had nothing whatever to do with opinions, but was strictly
analogous to the dissolution of the kingdom of Charlemagne under
his successors, through the rise of new provincial energies;
and the tyranny of the Turkish mercenaries was on all fours with
that of the Pretorians of the Roman Empire, and with that of the
Janissaries in later Turkey. The writer under notice has actually
recorded (p. 408) that the warlike sect of Ismailitic Karmathians,
who did more than any other enemy to dismember the Khalifate, were
unbelievers in the Koran, deniers of revelation, and disregarders
of prayer. The later Khalifs, puppets in the hands of the Turks,
were one and all devout believers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account