A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
Compare Gebler, p. 241; Private Life, p. 257, quoting
Tiraboschi. For an exposure of the many perversions of the facts
as to Galileo by Catholic writers see Parchappe, Galilée, sa
vie, etc., 2e Partie. To such straits has the Catholic Church
been reduced in this matter that part of its defence of the
treatment of Galileo is the plea that he unwarrantably asserted
that the fixity of the sun and the motion of the earth were
taught in the Scriptures. Sir Robert Inglis is quoted as having
maintained this view in England in 1824 (Mendham, The Literary
Policy of the Church of Rome, 2nd ed. 1830, p. 176), and the
same proposition was maintained in 1850 by a Roman cardinal. See
Galileo e l'Inquisizione, by Monsignor Marini, Roma, 1850, pp. 1,
53-54, etc. Had Galileo really taught as is there asserted, he
would only have been assenting to what his priestly opponents
constantly dinned in his ears. But in point of fact he had not so
assented; for in his letter to Castelli (see Gebler, pp. 46-50)
he had earnestly deprecated the argument from the Bible, urging
that, though Scripture could not err, its interpreters might
misunderstand it; and even going so far as to argue, with much
ingenuity, that the story of Joshua, literally interpreted,
could be made to harmonize with the Copernican theory, but not
at all with the Ptolemaic.
The thesis revived by Monsignor Marini deserves to rank as the
highest flight of absurdity and effrontery in the entire discussion
(cp. Berti, Giordano Bruno, 1889, p. 306, note). Every step in
both procedures of the Inquisition insists on the falsity and
the anti-scriptural character of the doctrine that the earth
moves round the sun (see Berti, Il Processo, p. 115 sq.; Gebler,
pp. 76-77, 230-34); and never once is it hinted that Galileo's
error lay in ascribing to the Bible the doctrine of the earth's
fixity. In the Roman Index of 1664 the works of Galileo and
Copernicus are alike vetoed, with all other writings affirming
the movement of the earth and the stability of the sun; and in
the Index of 1704 are included libri omnes docentes mobilitatem
terrae et immobilitatem solis (Putnam, The Censorship of the
Church of Rome, 1906-1907, i, 308, 312).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account