A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumesRobertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Religion
A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern, Volume 2 of 2: Third edition, Revised and Expanded, in two volumes
Robertson, J. M. (John Mackinnon)
Free thought -- History
and that, "if he should by his wit and learning proselyte a whole
nation to atheism, Hell would break loose on Earth, and he might soon
find himself exposed to all those violences and injuries which he
now securely practises." For the rest, they had better not affront
God, who may after all exist, and be able to revenge himself. [417]
And so forth.
Of deists as such, Sherlock has nothing to say beyond treating
as "practical atheists" men who admit the existence of God, yet
never go to church, though "religious worship is nothing else but
a public acknowledgment of God." Their non-attendance "is as great,
if not a greater affront to God, and contempt of him, than atheism
itself." [418] But the reverend writer's strongest resentment is
aroused by the spectacle of freethinkers asking for liberty of thought.
"It is a fulsome and nauseous thing," he breathlessly protests,
"to see the atheists and infidels of our days to turn great
reformers of religion, to set up a mighty cry for liberty of
conscience. For whatever reformation of religion may be needful
at this time, whatever liberty of conscience may be fit to be
granted, yet what have these men to do to meddle with it; those
who think religion a mere fable, and God to be an Utopian prince,
and conscience a man of clouts set up for a scarecrow to fright
such silly creatures from their beloved enjoyments, and hell and
heaven to be forged in the same mint with the poet's Styx and
Acheron and Elysian Fields? We are like to see blessed times,
if such men had but the reforming of religion." [419]
Dr Sherlock was not going to do good if the devil bade him.
The faith had a wittier champion in South; but he, in a Westminster
Abbey sermon of 1684-5, [420] mournfully declares that
"The weakness of our church discipline since its restoration,
whereby it has been scarce able to get any hold on men's
consciences, and much less able to keep it; and the great
prevalence of that atheistical doctrine of the Leviathan; and
the unhappy propagation of Erastianism; these things (I say)
with some others have been the sad and fatal causes that have
loosed the bands of conscience and eaten out the very heart and
sense of Christianity among us, to that degree, that there is now
scarce any religious tye or restraint upon persons, but merely
from those faint remainders of natural conscience, which God
will be sure to keep alive upon the hearts of men, as long as
they are men, for the great ends of his own providence, whether
they will or no. So that, were it not for this sole obstacle,
religion is not now so much in danger of being divided and torn
piecemeal by sects and factions, as of being at once devoured
by atheism. Which being so, let none wonder that irreligion is
accounted policy when it is grown even to a fashion; and passes
for wit, with some, as well as for wisdom with others."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account