A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217-1815. Volume II, 1689-1815Hannay, David
History
A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217-1815. Volume II, 1689-1815
Hannay, David
Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History
opponent, did not know what to do with her. Here are the two fleets in
the order in which they engaged:—
ENGLISH
=Defiance= 60 Capt. Andrews.
=Portland= 50 " Baird.
=Lancaster= 60 " Edgcumbe.
=Buckingham= }
(flagship of } 68 " Everitt.
Admiral West) }
=Captain= 64 " Catford.
=Intrepid= 64 " Young.
=Revenge= 64 " Cornwall.
=Princess Louisa= 60 " Noel.
=Trident= 64 " Durell.
=Ramillies= (flagship} 90 " Gardiner.
of Byng) }
=Culloden= 74 " Ward.
=Kingston= 60 " Parry.
FRENCH
_Lion_ 64 Capt. de Saint-Aignan.
_Triton_ 64 " de Mercier.
_Redoutable_ }
(flagship of }
Commodore } 74 " de Vilarzel.
de Glandèvez)}
_Orphée_ 64 " de Raymondis.
_Fier_ 50 " d’Herville.
_Guerrier_ 74 " Villars de
Labrosse.
_Foudroyant_ }
(flagship of } 80 " Froger de
La Galissonière) } l’Eguille.
_Téméraire_ 74 " de Beaumont
Lemaître.
_Hippopotame_ 50 " Rochemore.
_Content_ 64 " de Sabran
Grammont.
_Couronne_ (flagship }
of Commodore } 74 " Gabanous.
de La Clue) }
_Sage_ 64 " Durevest.
When the order to engage was given, the fleets were not parallel, but on
lines converging to form an acute angle ahead of them. Thus the leading
English ship was nearer the leading ship of the French than the rear
was to their rear. So if each bore down on the Frenchman opposite to
it at the time, the vessels in the van would come into action first,
and would be exposed to a converging fire, while it would depend on the
enemy’s decision to stay still and be attacked, whether the centre and
rear of the English fleet ever got into action at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account