A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217 to 1688Hannay, David
History
A Short History of the Royal Navy, 1217 to 1688
Hannay, David
Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History
were already approximating to a modern standard. Seamanship itself had
grown far beyond the humble standard of the early sixteenth century.
Then the seaman, at least the English seaman, was a mere coaster. When
the great queen died, he was already accustomed to far-ranging voyages,
and the navy was no longer expected only to carry soldiers across the
Channel, and fight a force no more expert than itself, but to invade
the West Indies, and at need to circumnavigate the globe. It followed
that the sailor became relatively more important, and as his skill
grew to be the most essential element of strength, his numbers had to
be increased. Sir Walter Raleigh in the following reign summed up the
changes which had taken place in his time.
"Whoever were the inventors, we find that every age has added somewhat
to ships; and in my time the shape of our English ships has been
greatly bettered. It is not long since the striking of the topmasts,
a wonderful ease to great ships, both at sea and in the harbour, hath
been devised, together with the chain-pump, which taketh up twice as
much water as the ordinary one did. We have lately added the bonnet,
and the drabler, to the courses; we have added studding-sails, the
weighing anchor by the capstern. We have fallen into consideration of
the length of cables, and by it we resist the malice of the greatest
winds that can blow. Witness the Hollanders, that were wont to ride
before Dunkirk with the wind at north-east, making a lee shore in all
weathers; for true it is, that the length of the cable is the life of
the ship in all extremities; and the reason is, that it makes so many
bendings and waves, as the ship riding at that length is not able to
stretch it, and nothing breaks that is not stretched."
When we speak of the greater size of Elizabeth's vessels, it must be
remembered that the increase of tonnage had been among the smaller, not
the greater warships. Some of King Henry's had been as large as, if not
larger than, any of Queen Elizabeth's, but then she did not have the
same swarm of mere cockboats. The navy was, in fact, tending to become
a more uniform as well as a more seaworthy force.
The armament of these ships was still very heterogeneous, and the names
of the pieces curiously fantastic. The following list gives the mere
denominations of the guns:--
Cannon
Demi-cannon
Culverins
Demi-culverins
Sakers
Mynions
Falcons
Falconets
Port-pece Halls
Port-pece Chambers
Fowler Halls
Fowler Chambers
and
Curtalls.
There is some uncertainty as to the weight of the shot fired by these
various pieces, and the following list must be taken with some reserve,
but it no doubt gives the calibres of the guns with substantial
accuracy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account