A Short History of the WorldWells, H. G. (Herbert George)
History
A Short History of the World
Wells, H. G. (Herbert George)
World history
For some centuries this Roman Empire did not fall into the grooves of
precedent that had so speedily swallowed up Persian and Greek, and all
that time it developed. The rulers of the Medes and Persians became
entirely Babylonized in a generation or so; they took over the tiara of
the king of kings and the temples and priesthoods of his gods;
Alexander and his successors followed in the same easy path of
assimilation; the Seleucid monarchs had much the same court and
administrative methods as Nebuchadnezzar; the Ptolemies became Pharaohs
and altogether Egyptian. They were assimilated just as before them the
Semitic conquerors of the Sumerians had been assimilated. But the
Romans ruled in their own city, and for some centuries kept to the laws
of their own nature. The only people who exercised any great mental
influence upon them before the second or third century A.D. were the
kindred and similar Greeks. So that the Roman Empire was essentially a
first attempt to rule a great dominion upon mainly Aryan lines. It was
so far a new pattern in history, it was an expanded Aryan republic.
The old pattern of a personal conqueror ruling over a capital city that
had grown up round the temple of a harvest god did not apply to it.
The Romans had gods and temples, but like the gods of the Greeks their
gods were quasi-human immortals, divine patricians. The Romans also
had blood sacrifices and even made human ones in times of stress,
things they may have learnt to do from their dusky Etruscan teachers;
but until Rome was long past its zenith neither priest nor temple
played a large part in Roman history.
The Roman Empire was a growth, an unplanned novel growth; the Roman
people found themselves engaged almost unawares in a vast
administrative experiment. It cannot be called a successful
experiment. In the end their empire collapsed altogether. And it
changed enormously in form and method from century to century. It
changed more in a hundred years than Bengal or Mesopotamia or Egypt
changed in a thousand. It was always changing. It never attained to
any fixity.
In a sense the experiment failed. In a sense the experiment remains
unfinished, and Europe and America to-day are still working out the
riddles of world-wide statescraft first confronted by the Roman people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account