A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage: Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this ArgumentCollier, Jeremy
General
A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage: Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this Argument
Collier, Jeremy
Theater -- England -- Early works to 1800; Theater -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Early works to 1800
And which is more, _Oedipus_ must be acquainted with his Age, having spent
the greatest part of his time with him at _Corinth_. So that in short, the
pith of the Story lies in this Circumstance. A Prince of Ninety years was
dead, and one who was wondred at for dying no sooner. And now why so much
Exclamation upon this occasion? Why must all the _Powers_ in Being be
Summon'd in to make the News Credible? This _Posse_ of _Interjections_
would have been more seasonably raised if the Man had been alive; for that
by the Poets Confession had been much the stranger Thing. However _Oedipus_
is almost out of his Wits about the Matter, and is Urgent for an account of
Particulars.
_That so the Tempest of my joys may rise
By just degrees, and hit at last the Stars._[219]
This is an empty ill proportion'd Rant, and without warrant in Nature or
Antiquity. _Sophocles_ does not represent _Oedipus_. in such Raptures of
Extravagant surprize. In the next page there's another Flight about
_Polybus_ his Death somewhat like This. It begins with a _Noverint
Universi._ You would think _Oedipus_ was going to make a _Bond_.
_Know, be it known to the limits of the World_;
This is scarce Sence, be it known.
_Yet farther, let it pass yon dazling roof
The Mansion of the Gods, and strike them deaf
With Everlasting peals of Thundring joy._
This Fustian puts me in mind of a _Couplet_ of _Taylors_ the _Water_ Poet,
which for the Beauty of the Thought are not very unlike.
_What if A Humble Bee should chance to strike,
With the But-End of an Antartick Pole._
I grant Mr. _Dryden_ clears himself of this _Act_ in his _Vindication_ of
the _Duke_ of _Guise_. But then why did he let these crude Fancies pass
uncorrected in his Friend? Such fluttering ungovern'd Transports, are
fitter for a Boys _Declamation_ then a _Tragedy_. But I shall trouble my
self no farther with this _Play_. To return therefore to the Argument in
Hand. In the _Provok'd Wife_ Sir _John Brute_ puts on the Habit of a
Clergyman, counterfeits himself drunk; quarrels with the _Constable_, and
is knock'd down and seiz'd. He rails, swears, curses, is lewd and profane,
to all the Heights of Madness and Debauchery: The _Officers_ and _Justice_
break jests upon him, and make him a sort of Representative of his
_Order_.[220]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account