A Source-Book of English Social HistoryJones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
History
A Source-Book of English Social History
Jones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Great Britain -- Social conditions
American affairs, however, played a part in the interests of great
classes of the nation, and in the growth of the empire. “No taxation,”
etc., was a party-cry rather than a real grievance; it was the
monopolist trade rules demanded by British merchants that ultimately
caused the war. To meet this monopoly the Americans adopted the
successful policy of refusing to import British goods.
The “Appeal to France” shows the motives inciting our Continental
enemies against us and also the weakness of America even at that date.
In the writings of Franklin, Deane, and de Warville, can be seen the
enthusiasm and debate which made the American example the real cradle
of “Libérté, égalité, fraternité,” a relation not usually stressed in
English history books.
The main effect of the century was the growth of a great capitalist
class able to control the national affairs, drawing their wealth
from the colonies, from new methods of agriculture, or of finance
and industry, such as are seen in the references to Defoe’s Tour,
Young’s Northern Tour, the Life of Coutts, and indications of the new
inventions in industry, and the conditions they produced.
A DEFENCE OF DISSENT
(D. Defoe’s Works, 2nd edition, _A New Test of the Church of England’s
Loyalty_, p. 406 _et seq._)
Our first Reformation from Popery was in the days of King Edward VI
... ‘twas under him that the whole Nation and Government embraced the
Protestant Reformed Religion ... and here it began to be called the
Church of England.
Some enquiring Christians were for making farther steps, and carrying
on the Reformation to a higher degree ... but the return of Popery
under Queen Mary put a stop to the work in general.... Queen Elizabeth
restored it again.... Those who insisted upon the further Reformation
were then called Puritans, because they set up for a greater purity of
worship; and they separated themselves from the Established Church....
Before this time there was no such thing as Church of England, it was
then the Church of Rome[30] that was the established National Church.
The Protestants under the title of Lollards, Wickliffians, Hussites,
what did they do? Did they, as our modern people say everybody should
conform to what the Government commanded? No, the present Church of
England party were the Dissenters, the Schismatics and Fanatics, in the
days of Henry VIII were persecuted for not coming to Church, many of
them put to death and always treated with scorn and contempt.... In the
next Ages these come to have the power in their hands and forgetting
that they had found it “Righteous in the sight of God to obey God
rather than man,” they treat those whose consciences oblige them to
dissent from them, with the same contempt which themselves had received
from the Roman [church] government.
Thus far they are upon even terms, as to obedience to their Superiors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account