A Source-Book of English Social HistoryJones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
History
A Source-Book of English Social History
Jones, M. E. Monckton (Mary Evelyn Monckton)
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Great Britain -- Social conditions
(1) They are dug in the pit a vast depth in the ground, sometimes
fifty, sixty to a hundred fathoms; and being loaded (for so the miners
call it) into a great basket or tub, are drawn up by a wheel and
horse, or horses, to the top of the shaft, or pit mouth, and there
thrown out upon a great heap to lie ready against the ships come into
the port to demand them.
(2) They are then loaded again into a great machine or wagon; which
by the means of an artificial road, called a wagon-way, goes with the
help of but one horse, and carries two chaldron, or more, at a time
and this, sometimes three or four miles to the nearest river or water
carriage they come at; and there they are either thrown into, or from
a great storehouse, called a steath, made so artificially, with one
part close to, or hanging over the water, that the lighters or keels
can come close to, or under it, and the coals be at once shot out of
the wagons into the said lighters, which carry them to the ships,
which I call the first loading upon the water.
INDIA IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
CAUSES OF THE LOSS OF CALCUTTA
(Evidence of David Rannie, Captain in E.I. Co.’s service, August, 1756)
(S. C. Hill, _Bengal in 1756-57_, Vol. III, pp. 283-4)
The causes of the war were principally three, viz., our acting
unjustifiably by the Moors [Mahommedans]; our being tricked out of
Cassim bazaar Fort, and the example shown on the coast of Coromandel,
where the English and French have in a great measure, it is said,
divided the country, while their respective Nabobs are no better than
shadows of what they should be.
The injustice to the Moors consists in that being by their courtesy
permitted to live here as merchants, to protect and judge what natives
were their [our?] servants, and to trade custom free, we under
that pretence protected all the Nabob’s subjects that claimed our
protection, though they were neither our servants nor our merchants,
and gave our _dustucks_ or passes to numbers of natives to trade
custom free, to the great prejudice of the Nabob’s revenue, nay more,
we levied large duties upon goods brought into our districts from the
very people that permitted us to trade custom free, and by numbers
of their [our?] impositions [framed to raise the Company’s revenue]
some of which were ruinous to ourselves, such as taxes on marriages,
provisions, transferring land, property, etc., caused eternal clamour
and complaints against us at Court.
INFLUENCE OF ENGLISH MERCHANTS ON COLONIAL POLICY
(Callender, _Economic History of the United States_, p. 140. Franklin,
_Causes of American Discontent_, Works, IV, p. 249)
The colonists being thus greatly alarmed ... by the news of the Act for
abolishing the legislature of New York, and the imposition of these new
duties ... (accompanied by a new set of revenue officers) ... began
seriously to consider their situation....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account