The group of symptoms due to offensive effluvia is, as Dr. Ballard remarks, a tolerably constant one, and consists of loss of appetite, nausea, headache, giddiness, faintness, and a general sense of depression, with, in some cases, vomiting and diarrhoea. But it is usually impossible to prove by statistics that these phenomena are due to a given effluvium complained of, for those who suffer from it are usually exposed to other causes of ill-health, such as poverty, overcrowding, collection of filth, etc.; and, on the {182} other hand, many of those exposed to the effluvium seem to suffer very little, if at all, from their surroundings. And so true is this, that in the carefully prepared report upon effluvium nuisances recently issued by Dr. Ballard,[2] it will be found that as a rule no attempt is made to prove that the effluvia from any particular branch of industry are injurious to health; the test practically applied is that they produce offensive odors. [Footnote 2: _Report in respect of the Inquiry as to Effluvium Nuisances arising in connection with various Manufacturing and other branches of Industry_. By Dr. Ballard, London. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1882, 8vo.] The legal view of this subject is given in the various decisions as to what should be considered a nuisance, the essence of which is the use of one's own property in such a way as to inflict damage upon, and injure the rights of, another. If a man collects on his own premises, for his own use, any material, such as water or filth, he is bound to retain it within his own premises or to let none of it escape in such a way as to damage others; and this holds good as regards gases, vapors, and odors. The decision of Mansfield, in the case of Rex _vs._ White, is often quoted approvingly by jurists, viz.: "It is not necessary that the smell be unwholesome; it is enough if it renders the enjoyment of life uncomfortable." But, practically, the question as to whether the discomfort produced is sufficient to produce ill-health will be the one upon which the physician is called to give evidence, and the one also upon which he will find it most difficult to obtain data sufficient to enable him to form a positive opinion. III. IMPURE WATER.--Of all the various preventable or removable causes of disease to which the attention of the physician engaged in practice in the small towns and rural districts is directed, it will usually be found that the water-supply is the most important, because it is in these localities that it is most liable to become contaminated in such a way as to produce sickness.