A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 : $b Pathology and general diseases
History
A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 1 : $b Pathology and general diseases
Medicine -- Practice
With regard to disinfectants, it may be well to note that none of the
{203} various patent disinfectants are superior to bichloride of
mercury, chloride of zinc, sulphate of iron, chlorine, and sulphurous
acid; very few are equal to them, and none cost so little. As a
gaseous disinfectant for rooms, etc. chlorine is superior to
sulphurous acid, but it has the disadvantage of injuring metals, is
not so easily applied, and is more costly. It will destroy the
vitality of the spores of the bacilli more rapidly and certainly than
sulphurous acid, which last, to make sure work, must be exhibited for
a much longer period than is customary. I should not feel confident as
to the thorough disinfection by sulphurous acid of the hold of an
infected ship unless the fumes had been applied for sixty hours.
Carbolic acid as ordinarily used is an antiseptic rather than a
disinfectant. Its vapor in a sick room is absolutely useless. When
applied in strong solution it is effective, for a time at least, but
as thus used it is expensive, its odor is unpleasant to many, and
masks the odors from putrefying substances and excreta, etc., thus
preventing the warning which these odors would give. Its use is in
many cases very much like removing the rattle from the rattlesnake.
The suggestions made above for limiting the spread of scarlatina from
a case to be treated in the residence of the patient apply--with
certain modifications for each form of disease, which will readily
suggest themselves to the physician--to all the affections due to
portable contagia.
Among the poorer classes, however, it will often be found impossible
to obtain the separate room and service and the constant intelligent
care which are necessary to ensure the desired result; and in such a
case the patient should be removed to a hospital, for his own sake as
well as for that of the community. The utility of small hospitals for
infectious diseases is by no means generally understood, and very few
of our small cities and towns are provided with anything of the sort.
If the subject is urged on the authorities of a place, the reply will
be that it is an unnecessary expense, that the people would not go to
it, and that such an institution is in itself a source of danger. The
facts are, that such a hospital costs very little, and is the cheapest
insurance against epidemics which a town can have; if it is kept clean
and comfortable, the people will use it freely, and if properly
managed it does not offer the slightest danger to the vicinity. This
question will be further discussed in the last section of this paper.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account