The relation of hysteria to certain morbid constitutional states has long been recognized, particularly its connection with the tubercular diathesis. This has been shown by numerous observers, especially among the French. The most valuable recent contribution is that of Grasset,[33] who believes that a direct connection can be traced between the tubercular diathesis and hysteria. When the relations of hysteria to the scrofulous and tubercular diathesis are spoken of by him, it is not meant that hysterical subjects have tubercles in the lungs, but that these diatheses are found in various generations, and that among some subjects of the hereditary series the constitutional states manifest themselves as hysteria. It is not the evidences of hysteria with pulmonary and other tuberculous conditions that he is considering, but that hysteria may be, and often is, a manifestation of the tubercular diathesis. Two cases may present themselves: in one the neurosis is the only manifestation of the diathesis; in the other, it is continued in the same subject along with the other diathetic manifestations. In demonstration of his thesis he concludes with a series of most interesting cases, which he arranges into two groups. In the first, hysteria is the only manifestation of the tubercular diathesis; in the second, are simultaneous pulmonary and hysterical manifestations. In the first group he has arrayed eight personal observations and seventeen derived from various authors; in the second he has two personal and seventeen compiled observations. [Footnote 33: “The Relation of Hysteria with the Scrofulous and the Tubercular Diathesis,” by J. Grasset, _Brain_, Jan., April, and July, 1884.] Personal experience and observation go far to confirm the views of Grasset, although I recognize fully the strength of the objection of Brachat and Dubois and others that, phthisis being such a common complaint, it might be demonstrated by statistics that it was related to {215} almost any disease. Not only hysteria, but other neuroses or psychoses, have a close connection with the tubercular diathesis. Among the insane and idiotic and among epileptics phthisis is of frequent occurrence. At the Pennsylvania Training School for Feeble-minded Children the frequency of phthisis among the inmates of the institution is one of the most striking clinical facts. The insane of our asylums die of pulmonary troubles oftener almost than of any other disease. The fact that hysteria is met with in the robust and vigorous does not invalidate the position taken, for the robust and vigorous who are not hysterical are not infrequently found in the descendants of the tuberculous. Laycock[34] believed that the gouty diathesis was particularly liable to give rise to the hysterical paroxysm or to irregular forms of hysteria. Gairdner, quoted by Handfield Jones,[35] supports this view. [Footnote 34: _A Treatise on the Nervous Diseases of Women_, by Thomas Laycock, M.D., London, 1840.]